The Effect of Stress on Decision-Making under Ambiguity:Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms
Shen Chengchun,Hu bohua,He Qinghua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230229
2023-01-01
Abstract:Decision-making under ambiguity, first proposed by American economist Knight, refers to uncertain decisions whose probability of distribution is unknown and decision-makers must rely on subjective judgment instead of deductive calculation or empirical estimation. Both ambiguity decision-making and risky decision-making belong to the category of uncertain decision-making, while risky decision-maker is informed of the exact probability. Stress can affect ambiguity decision-making, and many ambiguity decisions are often made under stress. Therefore, more researchers have been attracted to the research on the influence of stress on ambiguity decision-making. In this field, there have been many mature empirical studies,but unfortunately the results of these studies are not consistent. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the influence mechanism of stress on ambiguity decision-making and clarify the relationship between decision-making cognitive process and stress. This paper systematically reviewed the empirical research literature on the impact of stress on decision-making in recent five years, and summarized the effects of stress on ambiguity decision-making in behavioral and neural aspects from three aspects –learning feedback, reward sensitivity, and risk preference – based on the detailed analysis of the cognitive perspective, to clarify the consistency of different research results. Through literature analysis, it was found that many studies support the view that stress leads to the obstruction of learning feedback, but some studies have found that stress causes the improvement of vigilance and attention, making individuals more inclined to learn how to obtain the maximum and the most long-term return in the ambiguity decision-making situation. In terms of reward sensitivity, most studies showed that stress causes decision-makers to overemphasize reward and ignore punishment, while the opposite conclusion is that some people believe that stress significantly reduces reward sensitivity. In terms of risk preferences, the most common conclusion is that stress increases risk-taking behavior, but studies that differ from this conclusion still exist. Although the results of these studies are different, from the perspective of cognitive processing and the influencing mechanism, the effects of stress on ambiguity decision-making tend to be consistent, which are all negative effects of feedback obstruction, heavy reward and light punishment, and increased risk taking. The reason why some studies come to different conclusions is that stress is affected by other factors in the process of ambiguity decision making. For example, some studies carried out the effect of acute stress on decision making in subjects with a male to female ratio of 1:2. It was found that stress promoted better learning feedback of subjects, which actually ignored the influence of gender factor. Studies that suggest that stress makes decision makers more conservative ignore the influence of personality, age, and other factors. This paper attempts to explain why the influence of stress on ambiguity decision-making can lead to different results from two theories of the "Dual-system Processing" and the "Cognitive Resource Occupation". It is common that women under stress can cause "tend-and-befriend" mode of reaction, while men triggering "fight-or-flight". Therefore, studies with more female subjects are more likely to find the positive effect of stress on decision-making, while those with more male subjects are more negative. According to "Cognitive Resource Occupation", the participants’ perception of stress determines the impact of stress on decision-making. Generally, identifying stress as "challenge" will lead to positive effects, while identifying it as "threat" will lead to negative effects. Finally, based on the current research progress and shortcomings, it is proposed that future research should focus on the different effects of stress type and intensity on ambiguity decision-making, and further expand the research on the interaction effects of cognition and emotion in ambiguity decision-making under stress.