Abstract:Background: British Columbia's (BC) health policies mandated that, for medication cost to be covered under the universal drug plan, all new biologics initiations after June 2017 use biosimilars when available, and in May-December 2019, that current users of etanercept and infliximab for inflammatory arthritis (IA) transition to the corresponding biosimilar, providing the context for a natural experiment. Objectives: Our study objective was to compare infections and healthcare resource utilization (HRU), as surrogate markers of safety and effectiveness, between biosimilar switchers versus originator etanercept or infliximab users for IA, after and before the health policy change. Methods: We identified etanercept and infliximab users for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (Pso/PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritis (AS) in BC, using administrative health data. Biosimilar switchers were current biologic users who transitioned to the corresponding biosimilar during the period of May to December 2019. Historical controls were randomly selected from all new users of originator etanercept and infliximab before July 2017, matched to biosimilar switchers on age, sex, previous number of biologics used, and IA disease. Controls were assigned an index date (date of switching) such that duration on originator anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) was the same at index date for switchers and matched controls. Outcomes included number of severe infections (hospitalization with infection diagnostic code in any position); mild infections (oral/IV antibiotics without hospitalization); hospitalizations (any cause), physician and emergency department visits; and hospital length of stay (LOS). We followed patients from switching/index date for up to 2 years or until discontinuation, moving out-of-province, or end of follow-up (04/30/2019 for originators and 12/31/2021 for switchers), whichever occurred first. Quasi-Poisson Models estimated the adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of each outcome, with propensity overlap weights to control for imbalanced potential confounders, namely, age, sex, socio-economic status, rural vs. urban residence, health authority, arthritis type, number of prior biologic agents, duration of anti-TNF use at switch/index date, comorbidities, and other IA drugs used (glucocorticosteroids, MTX and non-MTX csDMARDs), measured at switching/index date. To account for the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection risk and HRU, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding study participants who transitioned to a biosimilar after October 1, 2019, and censoring follow-up time at March 31, 2020. Results: Our sample includes 1631 biosimilar switchers/controls (1402 etanercept; 229 infliximab): 556 (67.2%) RA, 178 (21.5%) AS, 93 (11.2%) Pso/PsA patients (Table 1). Higher risk of rheumatologist visits and lower risk of infections and HRU were observed in biosimilar users (Table 2). No significant differences were observed in the sensitivity analyses censored for COVID-19, except for higher rheumatologist visits in biosimilar infliximab users, and lower mild infections and hospital LOS in biosimilar etanercept users. Conclusion: Real-world population-based data from BC's health policy mandating transition from originator to biosimilar etanercept and infliximab for IA showed that biosimilar transition was not associated with higher rates of infections and HRU compared to continuing originator medications, suggesting comparable safety and effectiveness for use in IA and no unintended adverse consequences from the health policy. REFERENCES: NIL. Acknowledgements: This research was funded by a grant from the Canadian Rheumatology Association via CIORA (Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology Care). Dr. Lacaille is supported by the Mary Pack Chair in Arthritis Research from the University of British Columbia and The Arthritis Society of Canada. Dr. Antonio Avina Zubieta is a BC Lupus Society Research Scholar and a Walter & Marilyn Booth Research Scholar. Dr. Hui Xie is supported by the Milan Ilich/Merck Chair in Statistics for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases from Simon Fraser University. Disclosure of Interests: Diane Lacaille has received grant support for investigator initiated research from Biocon, Organon, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer., Kasra Moolooghy has received grant support for investigator initiated research from Janssen., J. Antonio Aviña-Zubieta: None declared, Yufei Zheng: None declared, Na Lu: None declared, Hui Xie: None declared.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Effectiveness and Safety Data in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients after Switching from Originator Rituximab to Biosimilar Rituximab (CT-P10)

Switching from rituximab originator to GP2013 or CT-P10 biosimilars in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: drug retention rate and safety data from a multicentric retrospective cohort

Rituximab As Maintenance Therapy Following Remission Induction in Relapsing or Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Controlled Phase II Study Comparing Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Ripertamab (SCT400) to Rituximab (mabthera in Patients with CD20-positive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Efficacy and safety of CT-P47 versus reference tocilizumab: 32-week results of a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase III study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, including 8 weeks of switching data from reference tocilizumab to CT-P47

A Developer's Perspective on Clinical Evidence and Benefits for Rituximab Biosimilar Uptake, with a Focus on CT-P10

AB0192 COMPARABLE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS AFTER TRANSITION TO A BIOSIMILAR ANTI-TNF IN INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: POPULATION-BASED EVIDENCE FROM A POLICY CHANGE

Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Efficacy of switching from originator etanercept to biosimilar YLB113 in real-world patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective 12 months follow-up study

Switching From Reference Adalimumab to SB5 (Adalimumab Biosimilar) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Multiple courses of rituximab produce sustained clinical and radiographic efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: 5-year data from the REFLEX study

Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of the biosimilar etanercept compared to the reference formulation original etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An open-label, randomized, comparative, multicenter study

Outcomes following switching from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in 1024 patients with RA: a matched-analysis of the BSRBR-RA

A Randomized Phase III Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of BAT2206 (proposed Ustekinumab Biosimilar) with Reference Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

P127 Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of a Proposed Biosimilar MSB11456 with Tocilizumab Reference Product in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Double-Blind Study

Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Biosimilar CT-P13 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Integrated Analysis of Three Japanese Prospective Observational Studies

SAT0139 A MULTICENTRE, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL ACTIVE-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING PHARMACOKINETICS, PHARMACODYNAMICS, SAFETY AND EXPLORATORY EFFICACY BETWEEN HLX01 AND EUROPE-SOURCED RITUXIMAB AS A NEW INDICATION IN CHINESE MODERATE TO SEVERE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Safety of Rituximab biosimilar (Riximyo®) following a single switch from the reference product in patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective study