NEO (NextGen 4D TM) Provided by SWIM's Surveillance SOA (SDN ASP for RNP 4D Ops)
James E. Dieudonne,H. Leslie Crane,Stanley R. Jones,Christopher J. Smith,Scott A. Remillard,Greg Snead
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icnsurv.2007.384175
2007-04-01
Abstract:4D Trajectory Management will require “operational changes” to the current traffic management system. These changes will be accomplished by the use of the Network Enabled Operations (NEO) concept. Meeting the goals and vision of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) will require major infrastructure and operational changes. However, by fully using the current capabilities of the National Airspace System (NAS), aircraft avionics, and the tenets of the System Wide Information Management (SWIM) program, this transition will be technically easy and will provide the means for the operational evolution. For NextGen to support 4D Trajectory Management in a safe and efficient manner, it must provide “the management team” (humans and automation algorithms) information that is current, highly accurate, and reliable. The management team must be aware at all times of the quality of information and that it is sufficient to support the trajectory management operation. NextGen (as with the current NAS) will be a very complex system and all types of information will be necessary to support operations, all of which will require SWIM and NEO to insure decisions are made with the right information and at the right time. This paper will only address the NextGen surveillance system and the information sharing necessary to support 4D Trajectory Management operations. Many other factors must be considered before achieving NextGen. 4D Trajectory Management will require the management team to have monitoring capability that supports approval of the “4D trajectory” (full NAS and likely global coverage), and the monitoring of the execution of the 4D trajectory by the “flight team” (humans and automation), which in some portions of the trajectory, will require highly accurate and timely monitoring information (e.g., very tight tailored arrivals or airport surface movement). This will require “networking” of the surveillance information (e.g., the Surveillance Data Network (SDN), new surveillance systems (e.g., Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) and multilateration systems), and the fusing of current and future surveillance sensors (e.g., the Multi-Source Tracker (MST)) to provide the “Actual Surveillance Performance” (ASP) to provide “real-time certification” that the surveillance information being used meets the Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) which is required to monitor the approved 4D trajectory. Almost all of these “pieces of the puzzle” have been demonstrated in recent years as part of the Global Communications, Navigation and Surveillance System (GCNSS) program, NEO Airspace Security Demonstration Spiral 0, Virtual Radar System (VRS), Enhanced Airspace Security (EAS), SPM for USAF's 84th RADES, Capstone, Safe-Flight 21, and SDN. RTCA and the FAA have been working on RNP and RSP requirements for types of operations, and Boeing, CAASD and many others have been trying to get a movement to a “Required Total System Performance” (RTSP) based system. The mathematics and application of Kalman Filtering (19) and Complementary Filtering (20), (21) and their production of the “most accurate solution” (22) were demonstrated on many similar problems.