Abstract:Three concrete buildings with six storeys above ground and two basements have been designed in detail according to the first generation of Eurocodes 2 (including structural fire design) and 8, as well as the official drafts of their second generation counterparts as of the end of 2023. In one horizontal direction the buildings have a wall-, frame-equivalent-dual- or frame-lateral-load-resisting system; in the other, the first two buildings have a wall-system and the third a wall-equivalent-dual. The design seismic action is in all cases according to the current generation Eurocode 8, scaled to a peak ground acceleration on rock of 0.2 or 0.3 g. Seismic design is for ductility class (DC) Medium (M) of the current generation or DC 3 of the new one, which have the same behaviour factors, q , in all structural systems considered; so, in each building seismic action effects from the analysis are the same for the two Eurocode generations. All designs are assessed through nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA), carried out according to the pertinent Eurocode 8 rules. Designs according to the second generation meet the performance goals of Eurocode 8 much better and transparently than with the first generation, but use markedly larger steel quantities and indeed often unnecessarily so, especially for confining reinforcement—which sometimes comes out in quantities that cannot be placed. Proposals are made for a more rational linkage of local ductility demands with the q -factor and implemented in alternative second generation designs. Minor changes to the new generation's design/detailing rules for ductile walls are also proposed and implemented in these alternative designs; they prove only partially effective in resolving certain deadlocks originating from poorly justified detailing rules that produce unnecessary and counterproductive wall flexural overstrengths. The new generation Eurocode 8 lacks design rules for the free height of ductile walls within rigid basements, which is a weak link, very likely to fail under the high shear force which balances the wall's moment resistance at the top of the rigid basement. NLRHA confirms that the alternative provisions proposed for second generation Eurocode 8 give more cost-effective designs than the first generation, with better overall performance at about the same or even lower cost.

A Comparative Design of a Multi-story Reinforced Concrete Building with Reentrant Corner Irregularity According to Turkish, Eurocode and ACI 318 Standards

Design of a multi-story steel building according to the Turkish Building Earthquake Codes: TBEC-2007 vs. TBEC-2018

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY STEEL STRUCTURES WITH IRRIGATION TO TORQUE ACCORDING TO 2018 EARTHQUAKE REGULATIONS

Performance-Based Assessment of RC Building with Short Columns Due to the Different Design Principles

A Comparative Case Study on Seismic Design of Tall Rc Frame-Core-Tube Structures in China and Usa

Comparative application to RC buildings of the two generations of Eurocodes and proposals for seismic design

Evaluation of structural irregularities based on architectural design considerations in Turkey

Behavior and Design of Slender Concrete-Filled Wide Rectangular Steel Tubular Columns under Axial Compression

Seismic performance evaluation of regular and irregular composite moment resisting frames

Examination of Structures Built with Tunnel Formwork in Terms of Strength and Cost according to the Earthquake Regulations of 2007 and 2018

Progressive Collapse Evaluation of a Reinforced Concrete High-rise Building Designed According to Turkish Earthquake Code

Comparison of Seismic Performance Between Typical Structural Steel Buildings Designed Following the Chinese and United States Codes

Performance-based versus conventional seismic design: comparative assessment on a 4-story RC moment frame

Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake code

The Effect of Different Infill Wall Materials and Their Location in Plan on the Behaviour of a Reinforced Concrete Building

Comparison of Seismic Design for Steel Moment Frames in Europe, the United States, Japan and China

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE RC FRAME-CORE TUBE STRUCTURE BETWEEN CHINA AND AMERICA

A Comparative Study of Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Using Chinese and African Seismic Codes

Performance Comparisons of Seismic Assessment Methods with PSD Test Results of a Deficient RC Frame

Performance evaluation of steel-concrete composite structures designed in poorly graded soils

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISE STRUCTURE USING ULTRA-LIGHTWEIGHT CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER FLOOR SYSTEM