The G20 must govern the shift to low-carbon energy

Andreas Goldthau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/546203a

IF: 64.8

2017-06-01

Nature

Abstract:Andreas Goldthau calls for the world's 20 largest economies to take the helm in managing the transition from fossil fuels while keeping the global economy stable.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The key role of No-Carbon State-Owned Enterprises in Global Climate Action: Leveraging the G20 forum to accelerate the energy transition

Leonardo Beltran-Rodriguez,Juan Roberto Lozano-Maya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v14i1.71801

2021-11-29

Abstract:The energy sector is the single largest source of carbon emissions, for which actions oriented to reduce its carbon intensity are critical to effectively tackle climate change. A great and yet largely untapped potential to reduce its emissions lies in oil and gas companies. Cognizant of this potential, in recent years several International Oil Companies (IOCs), publicly traded organizations with large capital access and wide geographical reach, have looked forward to effectively reduce their carbon intensity by shifting their operations to non-core low-carbon energy development. The IOCs have embraced this transition to leverage the business opportunities presented by political and social environments progressively more accountable of the energy sector’s contributions to climate change. Owing to the potential of this transition to produce positive climate outcomes, it has sparked great interest in an increasing number of stakeholders; nevertheless, National Oil Companies (NOCs) and other state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the energy sector are still notoriously absent. SOEs not only dominate the global oil and gas industry over IOCs, but they typically enjoy more favorable industry conditions, as they benefit from improved capital access and governmental support, as their overall value proposition, business strategies and budgets are interlinked with, or heavily influenced by governmental policies. Under a mutable business environment which favors the development of energy resources with low or zero carbon content, it is reasonable to anticipate that national governments will become more determined to join the energy transition through their SOEs based on two main reasons: meeting their national targets under global emissions reductions commitments while sustaining shareholder value. Given the complex efforts and resources in carrying out the energy transition at a pace and scale that effectively helps mitigate climate change, such initiative will set us in a deep decarbonization pathway if fully embraced by the world’s largest economies and their SOEs. The implementation of this initiative would allow NOCs and SOEs in these countries to transform themselves into No-Carbon State-Owned Enterprises that would strive for socially accountable sustainable growth, higher economic value and effective contributions in the global fight against climate change. This paper analyzes these issues and advances a proposal for the Group of the world’s 20 major economies (G20).
Will They Have Table Manners? the G20, Emerging Powers and Global Responsibility

Jorge Heine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461003763825

2010-01-01

Abstract:The creation of the G20 at leaders' level has signalled a major shift in North-South relations. Although the immediate cause for its launch was the global financial crisis of 2008, the underlying reasons relate to the existing global governance gap. Whereas globalisation - the flow of goods, services, capital, data and cultural products across national borders - has increased exponentially over the past two decades, rules and regulations governing it have lagged behind. This is also true of international institutions dealing with global governance, like the UN and the international financial institutions. A soft-law, informal group like the G20 at finance ministers' level, created in 1999, provided an ideal launching pad for a more ambitious and capacious entity that could take on the challenges of globalisation at the highest levels. Having held three meetings in 10 months and seemingly poised to replace the G7/8 (for economic governance purposes), the G20 seems well positioned to become institutionalised. Two key questions arise: what will it take to make it fully operational and what will be the role played by the key emerging powers in it?
Shift in the Center of Global Economic Governance

Hong Yousheng,Fang Qing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-3408.2012.02.005

2012-01-01

Abstract:If the Group of Seven （G7） nations, established in 1975, was a global .governance institution guiding world economic development, then the Group of 20 （G20） nations, which now includes emerging economies, is a global governance institution guiding the world＇s response to the global financial crisis since 2008.
G20 Institutional Transition and Global Tax Governance

Jiejin Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154687

2016-01-01

Abstract:The G20 is in transition from a short-term crisis institution to long-term steering institution, adopting a new G20 + established international organization' governance approach. In this approach, the main role of the G20 is to set the agenda and build political consensus for global economic governance. The established international organization provides the technical support and facilitates proposal implementation, while the precondition for the G20 institutional transition is that the emerging economies need to participate on an equal footing with the advanced economies. The case of global tax governance is among the few success stories of the G20's institutional transition. Within the G20 + OECD' governance architecture, the G20 builds the political consensus that the profits should be taxed where they are performed, while the OECD proposes the technical Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan. In this way, the G20's political leadership and the OECD's technical advantage complement each other, making a giant leap in global tax governance.
China and G20: From a Think Tank Case Perspective

Wen Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71955-9_3

2018-01-01

Abstract:The G20 has become the most important global governance institution. Since the global financial crisis of 2008, leaders from 20 major economies around the world met in Washington, DC to discuss how to deal with the crisis. Through coordinated cooperation, the G20 not only contributed to solving this crisis but also developed into a maturing institution in global economic and financial governance. In the annual G20 Summit, leaders from developed and developing countries can freely exchange their ideas regarding the most critical issues in global economy. The G20 plays an increasingly significant role in building a platform for coordinating different countries’ economic policy so that the global goal of economic growth can be realized.
The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind-solar energy consumption and coal consumption on carbon emission in G20 countries

Abdul Waris,Sher Khan,Martin Hronec,Marian Suplata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27442-y

IF: 5.8

2023-05-13

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:Globally, as a renewable source of energy, biofuel, wind, solar, and hydro energy have been increasingly valued by a range of businesses. There is no denying the advantages of using renewable energy in terms of preventing climate change and protecting the environment. Therefore, this article investigates the relationship among hydro, solar, biofuel, wind, coal consumption, and CO 2 emissions in 19 G20 member countries between 2000 and 2019. The results of dynamic fixed effects and the system-generalized method of moments suggest that solar energy and biofuel usage have a negative and statistically significant influence on carbon emissions. On the other hand, the impact of wind energy consumption on carbon dioxide emissions is positive and statistically significant. However, hydro energy consumption is statistically insignificant. The significance of this study is to include wind energy, solar energy, and hydro energy as new indicators for a group of 19 G20 member countries. Furthermore, this research paper also includes coal consumption in the existing model to confirm that CO2 emissions may rise if more coal is consumed. Growing the solar-hydro-biofuel-wind industry can reduce nonrenewable energy consumption and has tremendous potential to diminish carbon dioxide emissions.

environmental sciences
Environmental technology development and renewable energy transition role toward carbon-neutrality goals in G20 countries

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02804-3

IF: 4.3

2024-03-30

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Abstract:The transition to renewable energy is prioritized at the G20 Conference in 2023. This transition is essential for reducing carbon emissions, and environmental experts have stressed the urgency of identifying the factors fueling this energy transition. This paper examines the effects of the transition to renewable energy and environmental technology innovations on achieving the G20 nations' carbon-neutrality goals between 1995 and 2020. In addition to analyzing the contribution of non-renewable energy sources, financial development, the labor force, and economic growth have been analyzed, all the selected variables are found to have a long-term cointegration relationship. Given the asymmetrical nature of the data distribution, the study employs an advanced moment quantile regression method. The outcome identifies non-renewable energy, financial development, and labor force as significant contributors to consumption-driven CO 2 emissions throughout all quantiles. On the other hand, the development of renewable energy transition and advancements in environment-related technology innovations and economic growth led to a significant reduction in emission levels. The bootstrapped quantile regression provides additional confirmation of the reliability of these results. In addition, the panel causality analysis reveals both bidirectional and unidirectional causal connections among CO 2 emissions and the other evaluated factors. These findings suggest that environmentally friendly strategies, green technological advancements and renewable energy are crucial for carbon mitigation.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
Green transition and economic growth in G20 countries: evidence from disaggregated energy sources

Wasi Ul Hassan Shah,Xuhui Zhang,Rizwana Yasmeen,Ihtsham Ul Haq Padda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28781-6

Abstract:Green transitioning through renewable energy sources is the most effective strategy for any economy. This study investigates the extent to which G20 countries are shifting towards a green economy compared to prioritizing economic growth. To this end, the present study analyzes the nodes between income and renewable (solar, wind, hydro, and biomass) and nonrenewable (oil, coal, and gas) energy sources for the period of (1997-2020) in G20 countries. The energy-environmental Kuznets curve method is applied to study their behavior at various stages of growth. The main findings showed that wind, solar, and biomass energies have an inverted N-shaped relationship with income. The hydroelectricity did not follow any traditional EKC shape, showing a steady positive trend and growth. While nonrenewable energy consumption, i.e., coal, oil, and gas, follows an N-shaped EKC curve. The impact of foreign direct investment in the solar and wind sectors is positive. The varying outcomes concerning foreign direct investment (FDI) indicate that although G20 countries strive to achieve their green transition objectives by discouraging environmentally harmful investments, their success remains limited. The study indicates that G20 nations are progressing toward a green transition; however, additional technological innovations are required to transform these economies from brown to green. Governments can establish research institutions, offer grants and incentives, and encourage collaboration between academia, industry, and government to support green technology R&D.
Exploring the links between fossil fuel energy consumption, industrial value-added, and carbon emissions in G20 countries

Yongming Huang,Zebo Kuldasheva,Shakhrukh Bobojanov,Bekhzod Djalilov,Raufhon Salahodjaev,Shah Abbas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22605-9

IF: 5.8

2022-09-10

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:The primary objective of this study is to explore the links between fossil fuel energy consumption, industrial value-added, and carbon emissions in G20 countries over the period 1990–2020. Panel unit root test, co-integration test, and CS-ARDL estimator were used to determine the relationship among variables. The empirical results suggest that the driving force of carbon emissions in G20 countries varies significantly in advanced versus emerging economies. Evidence in a whole sample of G20 countries and advanced economies supports environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis, while no evidence emerging economies supports EKC hypothesis. Apart from this, the empirical results show trade opens, FDI, government expenditures on health and education, research and development, and information and communication technology are other determinators of carbon emissions in G20 countries. Our results suggest that countries upgrade industrial structures by shifting their energy structures away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy sources in order to achieve sustainable environmental goals.

environmental sciences
Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries

Muhammad Sheraz,Xu Deyi,Jaleel Ahmed,Saif Ullah,Atta Ullah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0

IF: 5.8

2021-03-05

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:The policy debate on the financial development and dynamic of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission is topical. Globalization can affect this relationship by making financial investments in green energy and environment-friendly technology, as environmental sustainability is the primary concern for modern society. This study proposes a newly formulated conceptual framework to explore globalization's moderating role on exoplanetary variables (financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and gross domestic product) and CO<sub>2</sub> emission. We employed Fixed Effect Ordinary Least Squares (FE-OLS), Driscoll–Kraay standard error approach (D–K), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin's (<a href="/article/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0#ref-CR29">2012</a>) panel causality test. Our sample of the study comprised full and subsamples of G20 countries (excluding the European Union) from 1986 to 2018. The results indicated that financial development and human capital decreased carbon emissions, while GDP and energy consumption substantially increased carbon emissions during the study time. Further, globalization moderated the positive impact of financial development and human development on carbon emissions. A sustainable environmental agenda is achieved by a stronger financial system, encouraging green finance, and including technical education that improves production efficiency. However, globalization moderated the negative impact of energy consumption and GDP on carbon emission. Besides, we also reported the bidirectional causal relationship of GDP to energy consumption. Our empirical research provides new insights for policymakers and governments to formulate country-based policies to protect environmental quality while achieving sustainable economic goals.

environmental sciences
The Global Energy Transition : Where Do We Go From Here ? BY

Malcolm T. Shealy,D. Simbeck,J. Dorian

Abstract:By 2040, the world is projected to consume 24 percent more energy than today, with developing countries surpassing the industrialized world as the largest group of energy consumers. Fossil fuels, including oil, coal, and gas, will remain the dominant sources of energy, accounting for about 45 percent of the projected increase in energy demand according to the Stated Policies Scenario of the International Energy Agency (IEA) of Paris (2019). Owing to its relative abundance, ease of transport, and relatively low carbon footprint, natural gas will be the fastest-growing fossil fuel, estimated to increase in volume about 36 percent over the 2018-2040 projection period. Oil consumption will also continue to rise, with much of the increase in demand geared to the transport sector. Much of that growth will be for diesel fuel use in developing countries, essential for the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia to increase their standard of living via transport and trade. Renewable energy will increasingly contribute to electricity generation, and remain the fastest growing source of electricity supply.

Environmental Science,Engineering,Economics
Giga-ton and tera-watt scale challenges at the energy - climate crossroads: A global perspective

Turgut M. Gür

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129971

IF: 9

2024-01-03

Energy

Abstract:Energy related CO 2 emissions from fossil fuels constitute nearly 80 % of the global greenhouse gas emissions and are largely responsible for effecting climate change. There is imminent need to reduce emissions and decarbonize the energy economy. Renewables and nuclear are the only carbon-free energy options. However, the pace of renewable deployment lags the rate needed to achieve net-zero by 2050. Also, fossil fuels are expected to continue to dominate the energy landscape into the foreseeable future. Built on these hypotheses, this article presents a global perspective on the multitude of giga-ton and tera-watt challenges in addressing energy security and climate change. It advocates a multi-prong strategy for a smooth transition into a sustainable future. This includes abandoning air-based combustion of fossil fuels in favor of advanced oxygen-based conversion technologies, expanding energy storage capacities to accelerate the penetration rate of renewables, universally pricing emissions, and rapidly deploying carbon capture technologies at massive scale. It also argues that decarbonization must prioritize zero-carbon output over zero-carbon input during this transition period. Accordingly, the article offers several oxygen-based technology options for cleaner utilization of fossil fuels including fuel cells for power generation and storage as well as downhill production of blue hydrogen.

energy & fuels,thermodynamics
Current Situation of World Clean Energy

HUANG Haifeng,LI Xian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2012.05.036

2012-01-01

Abstract:In the twenty-first Century,human being faces with serious problems of resources and environment,therefore,the development of clean energy,achieving economics and society sustainable development have become the mainstream of the world,governments compete for future clean energy market,from the policy guidance to the capital investment to support the clean energy market.This paper mainly relies on Who's Winning the Clean Energy Race? 2010 Edition: G-20 Investment Powering Forward released by the United States Pew Charitable Trusts to analyze the clean energy development and investment in current situation among G-20.
The Group of 20 transnational policy community: governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks

Diane Stone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314558035

IF: 2.397

2015-04-20

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Abstract:The G20 is an evolving international institution. Aided by both advances in information technology and support from home governments, a number of knowledge actors and networks seek to influence global economic governance with policy analysis and advice. This article assesses the international G20 think tank network called Think20 and the policy advocacy of private research institutes (such the Lowy Institute in Australia and the Centre for International Governance and Innovation in Canada) which are in the orbit of the G20 policy community. Think20 assists the global economic governance processes of the G20 by developing ‘coordinative discourses’ for policy development and implementation. Points for practitioners Ideas matter but ideas that imply major policy reform and innovation need to be made to matter if they are to direct government action. Networks provide one mechanism to broadcast and disseminate ‘communicative discourses’ to many different publics – local as well as global – and the infrastructure to crystalize and amplify ‘coordinative discourses’ underpinning the policy blueprints and reform proposals of governments that must motivate their own bureaucracies as well as collaborate with foreign government. This article discusses some of the network tools and practices for consensus building in ‘transnational policy communities’ that cultivate global policy coordination.

public administration
Decarbonizing the downturn: Addressing climate change in an age of stagnation

Jack Copley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221120986

2022-08-18

Abstract:Competition &Change, Ahead of Print. Meeting the Paris climate goals requires the global economy's urgent decarbonization. States and intergovernmental bodies insist that this should be pursued via a tremendous spike in private investment in renewable power – encouraged and coordinated by states. However, this renewable investment boom will have to swim against the current of the stagnation of the world economy since the 1970s, characterized by weak rates of investment and growth. Undertaking decarbonization in this context presents unique political economy dilemmas. Firstly, although slow growth helps to reduce carbon emissions by lowering energy use, it simultaneously impedes energy efficiency gains. Secondly, the stagnant state of global industry militates against its adoption of expensive decarbonized industrial processes. Thirdly, while most renewable power sources have failed to attract sufficient investment, those that have expanded rapidly – particularly solar photovoltaic – have tended to exhaust their growth potential due to falling prices and profitability. Finally, economic stagnation has destabilized political institutions, exerting pressures on governments to stimulate growth regardless of the environmental implications. States must navigate these intractable dilemmas as they strategize to decarbonize the downturn.

geography,economics,business
Global Emissions Trends and G20 Status and Outlook - Emissions Gap Report 2020 Chapter 2

Takeshi Kuramochi,Michel den Elzen,Glen P. Peters,C. J. Von Bergh,Monica Crippa,Andreas Geiges,Catrina Godinho,Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga,Ursula Fuentes Hutfilter,Kimon Keramidas,Yong-Gun Kim,Swithin Lui,Zhu Liu,Jos Olivier,Leonardo Nascimento,Joana Portugal‐Pereira,Değer Saygin,Claire Stockwell,Jorge Eliécer Villareal,William Wills

2020-01-01

Abstract:This chapter assesses the latest trends in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the progress of G20 members towards both the Cancun Pledges for 2020 and nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for 2025 and 2030. Throughout the chapter, the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on emissions in 2020 and by 2030 are considered. The chapter is organized as follows: section 2.2 takes stock of the current trends in total global GHG and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel use and industry-related sources. These trends are discussed in the context of global peaking of emissions and general economic trends. Sections 2.3 and 2.4 assess G20 members’ progress, both collectively and individually, towards their Cancun Pledges and NDCs.1 The assessment covers all individual G20 members and regions, including the European Union and its three individual Member States (France, Germany and Italy), as well as the United Kingdom (hereafter EU27+UK) as one member.2 Section 2.5 provides an update of announced net zero emissions goals and the implications for short- to medium-term action in the context of new and updated NDCs.
Transition to a low-CO2 emissions economy: China government policy for early-stage green finance

Xiaobing Huang,Yousaf Ali Khan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22905-0

IF: 5.8

2022-09-12

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:AbstractThe popularity of green economy as an innovative technique and financial mechanism has soared as a result of this exchange, the gross domestic product (GDP); transition economy (TE); CO2 emissions; human capital (HC); Government Fund Strategy (GFS); green finance (GF) play a very important role. When it comes to advancing genetic civilization, China’s achievements in the field of green money have become firm proof of the country’s progress. China has come to terms with the fact that it cannot continue on its current path of promoting monetary development at the expense of the environment, both for its own people and for the sake of the global community. The country has prioritized environmental concerns over equality with others through economic, political, social, and other factors. Furthermore, in order to accomplish the enormous goal, China’s cross-country coal use must be covered to allow it to peak before 2020, and fossil fuel byproducts must peak before 2030. This article argues that China’s “green drive” is a cause for optimism and concludes by arguing that the top 2030 goal for fossil fuel byproducts is ambitious but doable.

environmental sciences
A global consumer-led strategy to tackle climate change

Anthony J. Webster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.03364

2018-07-09

Physics and Society

Abstract:A successful response to climate change needs vast investments in low-carbon research, energy, and sustainable development. Governments can drive research, provide environmental regulation, and accelerate global development, but the necessary low-carbon investments of 2-3% GDP have yet to materialise. A new strategy to tackle climate change through consumer and government action is outlined. It relies on ethical investments for sustainable development and low-carbon energy, and a voluntarily financed low-carbon fund for adaptation to climate change. Together these enable a global response through individual actions and investments. With OECD savings exceeding 5% of disposable household income, ethical savings alone have considerable potential.
Relationship between natural resources, economic growth, and carbon emissions: The role of fintech, information technology and corruption to achieve the targets of COP-27

Zeng Jia,Majed Alharthi,Tian Haijun,Sumera Mehmood,Imran Hanif

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104751

IF: 8.222

2024-02-04

Resources Policy

Abstract:This study delves into the significant consequences of widespread natural resource exploitation in steering G-20 countries away from the carbon control goals set in COP-27. The investigation of resources and carbon emissions relationship by controlling information technology, financial technology (Fintech), and corruption factors reveals interesting outcomes. In this investigation, we employ panel data spanning from 2000 to 2021 for G-20 countries. The study examines the connection between carbon emissions and natural resource utilization using the Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL) methodology. The study's findings after controlling the role of information technology, Fintech, and corruption reveal ample pieces of evidence that the rents from natural gas, oil, and forest resources generate a larger portion of financial resources, and contribute significantly to controlling environmental risks, especially the dangers due to the alarming increase in CO2 emissions. Additionally, an inverted U-shaped relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth is indicated by the empirical findings. In conclusion, we provide pertinent recommendations aimed at steering G-20 economies toward achieving the targets set forth in COP-27. These recommendations primarily focus on mitigating the excessive consumption of natural resources, thereby fostering environmental sustainability.

environmental studies
Environmental technology, economic complexity, renewable electricity, environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: Implications for low-carbon future in G-10 bloc

Najia Saqib,Magdalena Radulescu,Muhammad Usman,Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente,Teodor Cilan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16457

IF: 3.776

2023-05-22

Heliyon

Abstract:This study investigates the impact of environmental technological innovation, economic complexity, energy productivity, the use of renewable electricity generation, and environmental taxes on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the G-10 countries for the timeframe from 1995 to 2020. The purpose of the study is to examine the need for a clear plan or strategy to achieve environmental objectives in G-10 countries. In both short-term and long-term projections, the increased use of environment-based technology, economic complexity, and renewable electricity generation has a major positive impact on carbon emission reduction. Moreover, the results demonstrate both unidirectional and bidirectional causality from carbon emissions to renewable energy, electrical generation, and environment-based technologies, respectively. Based on the results, the study proposes a number of concrete policies, such as updating modernized tax systems, increasing tax collection, providing individuals with the means to finance the Sustainable Development Goals through incentive regulations, and making grants from international organizations and the private sector available to finance investments toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and carbon neutrality environment targets. This is the study's most significant contribution in order to attain a sustainable and low-carbon future in the G-10 countries, which has policy implications for governments and policymakers.

The G20 must govern the shift to low-carbon energy

The key role of No-Carbon State-Owned Enterprises in Global Climate Action: Leveraging the G20 forum to accelerate the energy transition

Will They Have Table Manners? the G20, Emerging Powers and Global Responsibility

Shift in the Center of Global Economic Governance

G20 Institutional Transition and Global Tax Governance

China and G20: From a Think Tank Case Perspective

The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind-solar energy consumption and coal consumption on carbon emission in G20 countries

Environmental technology development and renewable energy transition role toward carbon-neutrality goals in G20 countries

Green transition and economic growth in G20 countries: evidence from disaggregated energy sources

Exploring the links between fossil fuel energy consumption, industrial value-added, and carbon emissions in G20 countries

Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries

The Global Energy Transition : Where Do We Go From Here ? BY

Giga-ton and tera-watt scale challenges at the energy - climate crossroads: A global perspective

Current Situation of World Clean Energy

The Group of 20 transnational policy community: governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks

Decarbonizing the downturn: Addressing climate change in an age of stagnation

Global Emissions Trends and G20 Status and Outlook - Emissions Gap Report 2020 Chapter 2

Transition to a low-CO2 emissions economy: China government policy for early-stage green finance

A global consumer-led strategy to tackle climate change

Relationship between natural resources, economic growth, and carbon emissions: The role of fintech, information technology and corruption to achieve the targets of COP-27

Environmental technology, economic complexity, renewable electricity, environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: Implications for low-carbon future in G-10 bloc