Critical congenital heart disease screening with a pulse oximetry in neonates

Şahin Hamilçıkan,Emrah Can
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0006
2018-02-23
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Objective: To compare the results of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in newborn infants performed at 24 h following. Method: Measurements were taken for each group at 24 h following birth. Echocardiography was performed if the SpO2 readings remained abnormal results. Results: A total of 4518 newborns were included in this prospective descriptive study. Of these, 2484 (60.3%) were delivered vaginally and 1685 (39.7%) by cesarean section. Median time points of the screening were 25.4 (25.3–25.5) vs. 17.3 (12.2–22.4) hours after birth. In 4109 infants screened 24 h after birth, the mean pre- and postductal oxygen saturations (SpO2) were 96.5±1.99 and 97.7±1.98, while 127 infants screened within 24 h of mean preductal and postductal SpO2 were 91.33±2.64 and 94.0±4.44. No CCHD was detected during the study period. Pulse oximetry screening was false positive for CCHD in 9 of 4109 infants (0.02%); of these, six infants were referred to pediatric cardiology and three cases were diagnosed as other significant, non-cardiac pathology. There were two cases with AVSD (atrioventricular septal defect, three cases with ventricular septal defect (VSD), and one case with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Conclusions: Saturation values are different between 24-h neonates in pulse oximetry screening. The screening in this study identified infants with other important pathologies, this forms an added value as an assessment tool for newborn infants.
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?