Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. A large body of research has investigated responses to artificial scenarios (e.g., trolley problem) where maximizing beneficial outcomes for the greater good (utilitarianism) conflicts with adherence to moral norms (deontology). The CNI model is a computational model that quantifies sensitivity to consequences for the greater good (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), and general preference for inaction versus action (I) in responses to plausible moral dilemmas based on real-world events. Expanding on a description of the CNI model, the current article provides (a) a comprehensive review of empirical findings obtained with the CNI model, (b) an analysis of their theoretical implications, (c) a discussion of criticisms of the CNI model, and (d) an overview of alternative approaches to disentangle multiple factors underlying moral-dilemma responses and the relation of these approaches to the CNI model. The article concludes with a discussion of open questions and new directions for future research.Public How do people make judgments about actions that violate moral norms yet maximize the greater good (e.g., sacrificing the well-being of a small number of people for the well-being of a larger number of people)? Research on this question has been criticized for relying on highly artificial scenarios and for conflating multiple distinct factors underlying responses in moral dilemmas. The current article reviews research that used a computational modeling approach to disentangle the roles of multiple distinct factors in responses to plausible moral dilemmas based on real-world events. By disentangling sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms, and general preference for inaction versus action in responses to realistic dilemmas, the reviewed work provides a more nuanced understanding of how people make judgments about the right course of action in moral dilemmas.

Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion

Moral Education: An Evaluation of the Effect of Moral Dilemma Discussions for Sixth Graders

The Influence of Superordinate Identity on Group Decision Making Through Discussion

Does Moral Education Improve Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issues Test

The means/side-effect distinction in moral cognition: A meta-analysis

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt

Moral reasoning and moral competence as predictors of cooperative behavior in a social dilemma

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm

Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

Moral judgment, decision times and emotional salience of a new developed set of sacrificial manual driving dilemmas

Situational Moral Evaluations: The Role of Rationalizations & Moral Identity

Moral preference reversals: Violations of procedure invariance in moral judgments of sacrificial dilemmas

Does Momentary Outcome‐Based Reflection Shape Bioethical Views? A Pre‐Post Intervention Design

The intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of a new experimental manipulation of co-rumination.

Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses

Teaching morality as an inclusive competence in higher education: Effects of dilemma discussion and contribution of empathy

Stand up to action: The postural effect of moral dilemma decision-making and the moderating role of dual processes

Confronting Consumers’ Complicity: Do Confrontations with Causal Responsibility for Sweatshop Labor Raise Moral Obligation?

An Eastern Look at a Western Dilemma: Cross-Cultural Differences in Action-Balanced Trolley Dilemmas

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments