Abstract:Purpose - This study theoretically points out that when measuring the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing, the cross-sectional variance decomposition method developed by Asdrubali, Sørensen and Yosha (1996) can result in biased estimates. This occurs because the method does not classify money flows for risk sharing into intranational and international categories. To overcome these limitations, the study proposes the use of Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method. Design/methodology - This study investigates, first, that analyzing intranational consumption risk sharing based on the variance decomposition method will inevitably produce biased estimation. Second, it examines how Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method estimates the effects of risk sharing by separating the domestic sources of money from overseas ones. As empirical evidence for these theoretical discussions, a comparative analysis is performed by using both methodologies to estimate South Korea’s intranational and international consumption risk sharing. Findings - The empirical results confirm that the variance decomposition method produced a biased estimation of the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing. Specifically, in South Korea, the degree of consumption risk sharing via capital and credit markets was overestimated, and that via the tax-transfer system was underestimated. The results also prove that Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method is effective not only in reducing the bias of the estimation results but also in measuring the degree of international consumption risk sharing for individual countries. Originality/value - Despite numerous studies that have capitalized on the variance decomposition method, little scholarly attention has been paid to the occurrence of bias in the method. Hence, this study makes a noteworthy academic contribution by addressing this under-researched area. Additionally, it stands out as the first of its kind to pioneer the utilization of Asdrubali and Kim So- Young’s (2011) method, offering a groundbreaking analysis of intranational and international consumption risk sharing.

Life-cycle consumption, precautionary saving, and risk sharing: an integrated analysis using household panel data

Crisis and Consumption Smoothing

Duesenberry's Theory of Consumption: Habit, Learning, and Ratcheting

What We Are Missing in the Analysis of Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing: Empirical Evidence from South Korea

Household Saving in China: the Keynesian Hypothesis, Life‐Cycle Hypothesis, and Precautionary Saving Theory

Higher Education Reform,Precautionary Saving and Consumer Behavior

Durable goods and consumer behavior with liquidity constraints

How Does the Composition of Asset Portfolios Affect Household Consumption: Evidence from China Based on Micro Data

Liquidity Constraint, Uncertainty and Household Consumption in China

Portfolio allocation over the life cycle with multiple late-in-life saving motives

Risk attitudes and household consumption behavior: Evidence from China

Fitting Parsimonious Household-Portfolio Models to Data

Consumers’ Consumption and Saving Plans – Are They Following an Euler Equation?

Consumption Behavior, Annuity Income and Mortality Risk of the Elderly

An asset allocation model with social insurance

Durable Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model with Foreign Factors for the Korean Stock Market

The Crowding Out Effect of Social Health Insurance on Precautionary Saving

Consumption and Saving: Another Glance at the Life Cycle Framework

Social Insurance and Household Consumption in China

Household Investment - the Horizon Effect

Uncertainty, Liquidity Restraints and the Chinese Household Consumption Behaviours