Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Assessing the measurement invariance of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale in Chinese and American adolescents

Brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across school levels among Chinese students

Factorial Invariance of the Questionnaire about Interpersonal Difficulties for Adolescents Across Spanish and Chinese Adolescent Samples

Perceived Interpersonal Sources of Life Satisfaction in Chinese and American Students: Cultural or Gender Differences?

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

The Chinese Version of the EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-Being: Testing Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

Validation of the Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness Scale with Chinese adolescents and young adults

A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.

Psychometric properties of a Mandarin Chinese version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 among Chinese adolescents

Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences Between American, Spanish and Chinese Adolescents Using the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A)

Testing Measurement Invariance of Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS)based on the Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Testing For Measurement Invariance of Attachment Across Chinese and American Adolescent Samples

Chinese version of the international positive and negative affect schedule short form: factor structure and measurement invariance

Psychometric Properties of the Abbreviated Version of the Dual School Climate and School Identification Measure–Student (SCASIM-St15) among Adolescents in China

Academic Interest Scale for Adolescents: Development, Validation, and Measurement Invariance With Chinese Students

Measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Weight Module (YQOL-W).

Measurement invariance of language brokering extent and attitudes in linguistic minority adolescents: Item response theory analyses.

Validation of a Chinese translation of the Parents’ Beliefs About Children’s Emotions questionnaire and measurement invariance across Chinese and US mothers