Efficacy of different irrigant protocols and application systems on sealer penetration using a stepwise CLSM analysis

Hacer Aksel,Selen Küçükkaya Eren,Nuhan Puralı,Ahmet Serper,Adham A. Azim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22944
2017-08-28
Microscopy Research and Technique
Abstract:This study compared several irrigation protocols and application systems for sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. Single-rooted-human teeth were divided into 5 experimental groups (n = 15) and a control group (n = 5), according to final irrigation protocols: standard needle irrigation (SNI); Vibringe; Vibringe + NaviTip FX (Vibringe NFX); Endo Spray (ES); and passive-ultrasonic-irrigation (PUI). Following obturation of the root canals, the percentage of the sealer penetration was measured at different depths using stepwise CLSM analysis. The sealer penetration in the experimental groups was significantly higher than the control group at all levels (p < .05). No significant differences were observed between Vibringe and SNI or Vibringe NFX, ES, and PUI at all depths (p > .05). The Vibringe NFX, ES, and PUI groups allowed deeper sealer penetration than SNI at 100, 250, and 500 μm levels (p < .05). The irrigant activation, the needle design, and the application form (syringe or spray) may impact the quality of the seal that is achieved with root canal filling.
biology,microscopy,anatomy & morphology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the effects of different root canal irrigation protocols and their application systems on the penetration of sealers into dentinal tubules. Specifically, the study compared five different irrigation protocols - standard needle irrigation (SNI), Vibringe system, Vibringe combined with NaviTip FX (Vibringe NFX), Endo Spray (ES), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) - on the effect of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules under analysis using step - by - step confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The main objective of the study was to evaluate how these different irrigation techniques and methods affect the penetration depth and quality of the sealer, which may potentially improve the outcome of root canal treatment, enhance the quality of root canal sealing, and reduce the risk of reinfection.