Abstract:The study of cyber strategy and its implications for international security has become increasingly crucial, necessitating an examination of the unique challenges posed by the dynamic and stealthy nature of the cyber domain. This paper addresses whether offensive or defensive strategies prevail in cyberspace, especially in light of evolving technological landscapes and debates over cyber threats. By applying offense-defense theory from international relations, the research explores the nuanced relationship between offensive and defensive operations in cyberspace. Despite prevalent views favoring offense dominance, recent skepticism questions the severity of cyber threats and suggests a possible overemphasis on offensive operations. This paper systematically examines the core concepts, findings, and operational variables of offense-defense theory, providing clarity to the conceptual debates surrounding cyber conflict. Recognizing the unique characteristics of the cyber domain, it urges a careful consideration of biases that may distort judgments about offense dominance. The evolving nature of cyberspace and its potential for redesign introduces caution and underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the offense-defense balance. The preliminary assessment concludes that the question of whether offense or defense "dominates" in cyberspace is overly simplistic. Given the intricate interactions of cyber capabilities, other coercive means available to states, and the dynamic evolution of cyber technology, this question can only be answered within specific contextual and chronological boundaries. Within such conditions, the state of the offense-defense balance is crucial to tactical and operational decision-making. At the strategic policymaking level, the more coherent question is how cyber technologies are shifting the balance of advantages between offense and defense in the overall military posture of states. In essence, this paper provides valuable insights into the ongoing discourse on cyber strategy, theoretical frameworks, and nuanced analyses to inform policy and strategic decision-making in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Framing a Special Operations Umbrella Concept for Low Intensity Conflict

A Theory of Offensive Cyberspace Operations and Its Policy and Strategy Implications

Counterinsurgency in (un)changing times? Colonialism, hearts and minds, and the war on terror

Special Operations Forces: A Global Immune System?

Reoptimizing Combat and Operational Stress Control in the U.S. Air Force

Framework for Interoperable Command & Control of Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations

ClausewitzGPT Framework: A New Frontier in Theoretical Large Language Model Enhanced Information Operations

The Rise of iWar: Identity, Information, and the Individualization of Modern Warfare

The Offense-Defense Balance in Cyberspace

Re-Envisioning Command and Control

Applying Political Knowledge in Modern Combat: How the U.S. Military Can Use Social Science to Achieve Cross-Cultural Competency

The Unsinkable Aircraft Carrier - An American Response to the Chinese Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) Challenge

The Role of Human Terrain and Cultural Intelligence in Contemporary Hybrid and Urban Warfare

Unconventional Warfare Medicine Is the Ultimate Prolonged Field Care

Revisiting Naval Conceptualism with reference to Corbett and Mahan

Back to the basics: international relations, intelligence, and strategic competition

Military Electronic Systems for Command and Control

Unifying warfighting functions in mathematical modelling: combat, manoeuvre, and C2

Framing Strategic Conflicts: Redesign of the American Negotiating Style

Disguised Among the Sea: The Implications of Artificial Islands on Casualty Care in the Indo-Pacific

Post-Westgate SWAT : C4ISTAR Architectural Framework for Autonomous Network Integrated Multifaceted Warfighting Solutions Version 1.0 : A Peer-Reviewed Monograph