Abstract:Many design educators are concerned with urgent problems such as sustainable development [1] and climate change [2]. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2018 report clearly states that rapid decarbonization is needed by year 2030 to avoid climate change catastrophe. Such planetary level problems impact people's everyday existence within the biosphere, and require short-term design action alignment with long-term vision goals. However, many design educators teach to design for increasingly shorter time horizons within consumerist worldviews (e.g., rapid-prototyping, agile, human-centered design). In this paper, we describe a course that teaches design students how to align short-term design to long-term timescales. We leverage Future Studies researchers' work on how to teach students greater agency within long-term timescale horizons [3]. We describe an effective and efficient blended learning design pedagogy (e.g., combining online and face-to-face learning activities) [4] to engage with new global challenges such as climate change and sustainability (e.g., [5], [6], [7]). Dexign Futures, is a required design studies course for all third-year undergraduate students in the School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University. The term "dexign," refers to an experimental form of design that combines design thinking [8] with futures thinking [9]. Due to time constraints of student schedule, the course was taught as a blended learning course with half the time and three times as many students as a traditional design studio course. Students' first exposure to new materials was an online platform where they watched videos, answered questions, and received immediate correctness feedback. During in-class sessions we discussed homework questions and did interactive hands-on design exercises. Prior research established the efficacy and areas for improvement of the Dexign Futures course as taught at Carnegie Mellon University to 40-50 students each year [5, 6, 7]. We are exploring how to share the course at scale in China. We've identified four challenges in our plans: modular design, teaching professors and students, synthesizing content, and deploying a western learning platform in the Chinese internet.

Interrogating Futures in Industrial Design Education

Educational Methods and Practices for Futures-Thinking-Based Interaction Design Curricula

Explore Alternative Future: A Case Study of Cultivating Designers’ Future Literacy Via Hybrid Collaboration

An Investigation into a Digital Strategy for Industrial Design Education

Exploring Features of the Design on Futures Thinking

Preliminary Study on Students’ Experiences in Design-Based Interdisciplinary Learning

Future Footprint: A Future Signal-Driven Design Ideation Tool.

Trends on Design Tools Under Futurology

Acknowledging Identity and Intersectionality—A Transformative Framework for Design Education Futures

Triangulating on Possible Futures: Conducting User Studies on Several Futures Instead of Only One

Teaching To Dexign Futures In China: A Vision For A Blended Learning Pedagogy To Be Deployed At Scale

Stay competitive in 2035: a scenario-based method to foresight in the design and manufacturing industry

The Reflection of Experiential Knowledge Into Professional Practice: Case of Industrial Design Education

Infusing technology driven design thinking in industrial design education: a case study

How HCI Integrates Speculative Thinking to Envision Futures

Envisioning the Future Scenario Through Design Fiction Generating Toolkits.

Adapting Engineering Education to Industrie 4.0 Vision

PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF SERVICE DESIGN FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN EDUCATION: CURRENT CLAIMS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Two Categories of Future-Oriented Design: the Affirmative Design and the Alternative Design.

Making sense of youth futures narratives: Recognition of emerging tensions in students’ imagination of the future

Industrial Design education in Australia: a competence analysis across primary, secondary and tertiary education levels