Abstract:Social and economic policies of governments directly influence the health of the people. These policies, in turn, are determined by the national and foreign controllers of power. Economic and social factors in Turkey during the late 1970s led to a new modelling of the economic system, from a Keynesian to a market-oriented and monetarist model. The state mechanism was also altered to form a centralized, authoritarian regime in order to enforce the requirements of the economy. As a result, the middle class diminished in size, inequalities in income distribution increased, unemployment climbed, the purchasing power of wage earners decreased, government spending for education and health was cut and new oppressive laws were enacted. Health services were already urban-biased and hospital-oriented, but new free-market measures were instituted which promoted private health institutions and attempted to transform state-owned and financed hospitals into self-supporting, independent business enterprises. The only school of public health was closed down; preventive medicine expenditures were lowered while hospital rates and drug prices were increased. All these changes affected the health status of the population. Mortality and morbidity inequalities had already existed between the rich and the poor, men and women, urban and rural settlements, educated and illiterate, West and East, always in favour of the former. However, the new policies exacerbated the inequities. Infectious diseases including tuberculosis increased, nutrition worsened, occupational diseases and work accidents rose to be the highest in Europe. The power-holding minority is not interested in the health of populations and is committed to pursue its social and economic policies. Ad hoc research, especially cross-sectional mortality studies repeated at regular intervals can provide data on the most vulnerable groups as no other valid information exists. There is little hope of these data being used for intervention unless democratic changes take place.

Income Distribution in Turkey during the Global Financial Crisis

Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Income Inequality: Time Series Evidence from Turkey

The Effect of Social Transfers on Income Inequality and Poverty in Türkiye

A Vicious Circle: The Interaction between Income Distribution and Household Indebtedness in the Neoliberal Era

National income distribution: a countrywise analysis

Inequality in Turkey: Looking Beyond Growth

Factors Affecting the Financial Performance of the Firms during the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Turkey

International Income Risk-Sharing and the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009

The aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency during crisis periods in Turkey: a comparative analysis with COVID-19 outbreak and the global financial crisis

Health and social inequities in Turkey

Glass ceiling, sticky floor, or both? Public and private sector differences in Türkiye

Rising Female Labor Force Participation and Gender Wage Gap: Evidence From Turkey

Depressive symptoms and associated socioeconomic and clinic factors: Three different years data from Türkiye

A Current Assessment of Household Indebtedness in Turkey and the Possible Consequences of Household Indebtedness

The Relationships Between the Female Labor Force Participation Rate and Economic Development: A Correlation Analysis for Turkey

Application of Early Warning Systems With Leading Indicators in Financial Crises Forecast: The Example of Turkey Years 2016-2019

Revisiting the Role of Post-Materialist Values on Environmental Concern: An Analysis of Turkish Public Perception Over Climate Change Between the Years 2018-2020

Financial Openness and Total Factor Productivity in Turkey

Deepening Labor Market Inequalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Turkey

Unpaid work, paid work and gender inequality: An analysis of time transfer accounts for Turkey

Impact of Political Risk on Foreign Direct Investment with Fourier Approach: The Case of Turkey