Perception of Radiation Risk as a Predictor of Mid-Term Mental Health after a Nuclear Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey

Itaru Miura,Masato Nagai,Masaharu Maeda,Mayumi Harigane,Senta Fujii,Misari Oe,Hirooki Yabe,Yuriko Suzuki,Hideto Takahashi,Tetsuya Ohira,Seiji Yasumura,Masafumi Abe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091067
IF: 4.614
2017-09-15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Predictive factors including risk perception for mid-term mental health after a nuclear disaster remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between perceived radiation risk and other factors at baseline and mid-term mental health after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster of 2011 in Japan. A mail-based questionnaire survey was conducted in January 2012 and January 2013. Mental health status was assessed using the K6 scale. Psychological distress over the 2-year period was categorized into the following four groups: chronic, recovered, resistant, or worsened. Most participants (80.3%) were resistant to the disaster. A positive association was found between the radiation risk perception regarding immediate effects and the worsened group in women. Baseline post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or a history of psychiatric disease predicted being in the chronic or worsened group in mid-term course. These results suggest that evacuees who believed that their health was substantially affected by the nuclear disaster were at an increased risk of having poor mid-term mental health in women. Careful assessment of risk perception after a nuclear disaster, including the presence of PTSD or a history of psychiatric disease, is needed for appropriate interventions.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?