Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support

Kristen Miller,Danielle Mosby,Muge Capan,Rebecca Kowalski,Raj Ratwani,Yaman Noaiseh,Rachel Kraft,Sanford Schwartz,William S Weintraub,Ryan Arnold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx118
2017-11-06
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Abstract:Abstract Objective Provider acceptance and associated patient outcomes are widely discussed in the evaluation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs), but critical design criteria for tools have generally been overlooked. The objective of this work is to inform electronic health record alert optimization and clinical practice workflow by identifying, compiling, and reporting design recommendations for CDSS to support the efficient, effective, and timely delivery of high-quality care. Material and Methods A narrative review was conducted from 2000 to 2016 in PubMed and The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society to identify papers that discussed/recommended design features of CDSSs that are associated with the success of these systems. Results Fourteen papers were included as meeting the criteria and were found to have a total of 42 unique recommendations; 11 were classified as interface features, 10 as information features, and 21 as interaction features. Discussion Features are defined and described, providing actionable guidance that can be applied to CDSS development and policy. To our knowledge, no reviews have been completed that discuss/recommend design features of CDSS at this scale, and thus we found that this was important for the body of literature. The recommendations identified in this narrative review will help to optimize design, organization, management, presentation, and utilization of information through presentation, content, and function. The designation of 3 categories (interface, information, and interaction) should be further evaluated to determine the critical importance of the categories. Future work will determine how to prioritize them with limited resources for designers and developers in order to maximize the clinical utility of CDSS. Conclusion This review will expand the field of knowledge and provide a novel organization structure to identify key recommendations for CDSS.
information science & library science,computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?