Abstract:Aim: To investigate the influence of pulse energy, tip geometry and tip position in simulated 3D-printed root canals with multiple side canals at different levels in all directions on the cleaning performance of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) compared to sonic activation (EDDY) and conventional needle irrigation (NI). Methodology: 3D-printed root canal models (25/.06, length 20 mm, curvature 60°, radius 5 mm) with side canals (diameter 0.2 mm) at 2, 5 and 8 mm from the apex were filled with coloured biofilm-mimicking hydrogel. LAI (Morita AdvErL Evo, Kyoto, Japan) was performed with six settings (n = 20; pulse-energy, pulses per second [PPS], tip position): LAI1 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, canal entrance [CE]), LAI2 (same as LAI1, but insertion depth 9 mm before the apical endpoint [AE] [corresponding to 1 mm above the first lateral canals]), LAI3 (80 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, 9 mm before AE), LAI4 (same as LAI 3, but at CE) for 3 × 20 s each, LAI5 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL 2 × 20 s, CE & R200T (30 mJ, 25 PPS, 1 × 20 s, 9 mm before AE), LAI6 (30 mJ, 25 PPS, R200T, 9 mm before AE, 3 × 20 s). A continuous irrigation (3 mL/20 s) using distilled water accompanied the irrigation cycles. NI and EDDY (3 × 20 s each; 3 mL/20 s irrigation, insertion AE minus 1 mm, amplitude 4 mm) served as control groups. Biofilm-mimicking hydrogel removal (ImageJ, NIH) was assessed for the entire system, the central canal and the lateral canals using standardized photographs with a microscope (Expert DN, Müller-Optronic) and statistically analysed was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p = .05). Irrigant extrusion beyond the foramina was also recorded. Results: LAI2 (99.08%; interquartile range [IQR]: 96.85-100.00) and LAI3 (97.50%; 96.24-100.00) achieved the significantly best and LAI6 (80.08%; 73.41-84.69) the significantly worst removal of hydrogel from the entire root canal system amongst all LAI configurations (p < .05). There were no significant differences between LAI6, EDDY (72.89%; 67.49-76.22) and manual irrigation (54.39%; 51.01-56.94) (p > .05). R200T laser tip caused significantly more often irrigant extrusion than all other techniques (p < .05). Conclusion: Tip design, energy settings, and the positioning of the laser tip below the canal entrance caused an improvement in cleaning performance of the LAI. However, the small R200T tip created significantly more procedural errors (irrigant extrusion) due to higher concentrated energy.

The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation and laser based root canal irrigation methods on debris removal

Effect of different laser-assisted irrigation activation techniques on apical debris extrusion

The effects of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods on smear and debris removal in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavities

Effectiveness of three auxiliary irrigation methods for cleaning the internal walls of root canals of curved isolated teeth

Effect of ultrasonic and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated irrigation protocol on dual-species root canal biofilm removal: An in vitro study

Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers

Comparison of the removal of intracanal medicaments used in regenerative endodontics from root canal system using needle, ultrasonic, sonic, and laser-activated irrigation systems

Influence of pulse energy, tip design and insertion depth during Er:YAG-activated irrigation on cleaning efficacy in simulated severely curved complex root canal systems in vitro

Comparison of Er:YAG Laser and Ultrasonic in Root Canal Disinfection under Minimally Invasive Access Cavity

In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study

Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.

Antibacterial and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation by Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming in Primary Molar Root Canals: A Preliminary Study

Efficacy of Laser-Activated Irrigants in Calcium Hydroxide Removal from the Artificial Grooves in Root Canals: An Ex Vivo Study

The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An In Vitro Study

Comparison of vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different root canal irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument

Effect of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming and shock-wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming technique on the removal of the smear layer after root canal preparation in curved root canals

A Comparative Evaluation of the Cleaning Efficacy of Five Different Root Canal Irrigation Devices: A Histological Study

The efficacy of a novel SWEEPS laser-activated irrigation compared to ultrasonic activation in the removal of pulp tissue from an isthmus area in the apical third of the root canal

The effect of different irrigation activation methods on the penetration of the irrigation solution into the dentinal tubules in teeth with calcium hydroxide applied and oval‐shaped canals: Confocal laser scanning microscope analysis

Evaluation of Sonic, Ultrasonic, and Laser Irrigation Activation Systems to Eliminate Bacteria from the Dentinal Tubules of the Root Canal System.

Effect of laser-activated irrigation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: An in vitro study