Abstract:When it was discovered in the 1970s as a ubiquitous protein, ubiquitin, a 76-aminoacid peptide, had no assigned function. It was not until later that ubiquitin was found to be a necessary cofactor in a vital cellular process: the degradation of proteins. Work by Avram Hershko, Aaron Ciechanover, and Irwin Rose (for which they received the 2004 Nobel Prize in Chemistry) showed that the covalent attachment of ubiquitin provide proteins with a tag that dispatches them to the proteasome, the main cell degradation machinery (Ciechanover 2012). Subsequent work, has revealed that ubiquitin belongs to a broader family of ubiquitin-like proteins that can modify not only protein stability, but also subcellular localization and function. In the following years, ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers were found to have a profound influence on all aspects of plant life. Indeed, about 6% of the plant genome encodes for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like related components ( Vierstra 2009). The articles and reviews in this Special Issue of the Journal of Integrative Plant Biology provide an update on our knowledge of this protein modification system in plant biology. The canonical Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS), in which proteins are first ubiquitinated and then degraded by the proteasome, has been involved in the regulation of almost all plant hormones, including auxin, gibberellin, ethylene, jasmonic acid and abscic acid. The UPS is also involved in the regulation of developmental processes such as photomorphogenesis, flowering time, self-incompatibility, gametogenesis and biotic/abiotic stress responses. Recently, an increasing amount of evidence has implicated the UPS in additional developmental processes, such as the regulation of meristem formation and maintenance (Di Giacomo et al. 2013). Further indications of the function of the UPS pathway in gametophytic and embryo development are provided in this issue by Wang and coauthors. These authors found a critical role of the anaphasepromoting complex/cyclosomesubunit 1 (APC1) in both female gametogenesis and embryogenesis in Arabidopsis (Wang et al. 2013). Previously the same group also found that four closely-related RING-type E3 ligases are involved in pollen mitosis II regulation (Luo et al. 2012). The UPS is also necessary for plant responses to abiotic stress. For example, the E3 ligases of the CULLIN-RING family

Sumoylation, Phosphorylation, and Acetylation Fine-Tune the Turnover of Plant Immunity Components Mediated by Ubiquitination

Ubiquitination of Receptorsomes, Frontline of Plant Immunity.

Proteolysis in plant immunity

Ubiquitylome Analysis Reveals a Central Role for the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Plant Innate Immunity

SUMO Conjugating Enzyme: a Vital Player of SUMO Pathway in Plants

SUMOylation and Its Biological Function in Plants

Advance in Research on the Regulation of Innate Immune Response by Ubiquitination

SUMO and SUMOylation in Plant Abiotic Stress

Ubiquitination Modification Precisely Modulates the ABA Signaling Pathway in Plants.

Posttranslational Modifications of the Master Transcriptional Regulator NPR1 Enable Dynamic but Tight Control of Plant Immune Responses

Roles of Ubiquitination-Mediated Protein Degradation in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses

Advances on Plant Ubiquitylome-From Mechanism to Application.

The Ever Expanding Role of Ubiquitin and SUMO in Plant Biology.

Proteomic Analysis of Ubiquitinated Proteins in Rice (oryza Sativa) after Treatment with Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Elicitors.

Ubiquitination from the perspective of plant pathogens

Protein Post-Translational Modifications in Auxin Signaling.

Heat-induced SUMOylation differentially affects bacterial effectors in plant cells

Ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptors in plant innate immunity.

The Plant Ubiquitin-Proteasome System as a Target for Microbial Manipulation

The ubiquitin system affects agronomic plant traits

Deciphering the mechanism of E3 ubiquitin ligases in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses and perspectives on PROTACs for crop resistance