Is Container a Natural and Embodied Image Schema? A Developmental, Pragmatic, and Cultural Proposal

Nicolás Alessandroni,Cintia Rodríguez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000478841
2017-01-01
Human Development
Abstract:Conceptual metaphor theory showed, from <i>embodiment</i>, the importance of metaphor as a cognitive process. This influential theory assumes the existence of primitive but powerful mental structures called <i>image schemas.</i> In this paper, we conduct a critical inquiry about these structures from the developmental perspective of the<i> pragmatics of the object</i> and show they have serious problems. Taking the &lt;smlcap&gt;CONTAINER&lt;/smlcap&gt; image schema as a case, we discuss the plausibility of image schemas in early childhood. We suggest that children do not interact with objects as if a basic and generic &lt;smlcap&gt;CONTAINER&lt;/smlcap&gt; cognitive structure preexisted. Instead, in everyday life, they use “container” objects to fulfill very different functions. As <i>object function</i> is construed by children's participation in triadic child-adult-object experiences through semiotic mediation, we propose image schemas are not natural or direct, do not exist in early childhood, and are a developmental, pragmatic, and cultural product. As empirical illustration, we analyze a child-mother-objects interaction at home.
psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?