Abstract:Summary Neonicotinoid insecticides are routinely used as seed treatments on most grain and oilseed crops in the USA , yet the extent and likelihood of spread of insecticide residues during planting has not previously been quantified. Honey bees, Apis mellifera , are highly mobile and highly sensitive to neonicotinoid residues, presenting an opportunity to estimate non‐target exposures to neonicotinoids in mobile insects. We measured neonicotinoid dust drift during maize sowing and used sites of maize fields, apiary locations and honey bee foraging radii to estimate likelihood of forager exposure. We performed a concurrent multi‐year field assessment of the pest management benefits of neonicotinoid‐treated maize. Our results indicate that over 94% of honey bee foragers throughout the state of Indiana are at risk of exposure to varying levels of neonicotinoid insecticides, including lethal levels, during sowing of maize. We documented no benefit of the insecticidal seed treatments for crop yield during the study. Synthesis and applications . We demonstrate movement of neonicotinoid residues well beyond planted fields occurs during maize sowing in Indiana. Based on locations of maize fields and apiaries in the state, the likelihood of neonicotinoid exposure for foraging honey bees is high. Other non‐target organisms are also likely to encounter neonicotinoid residues; we conservatively estimate that deposition of neonicotinoid residues on non‐target lands and waterways will occur on over 42% of the state of Indiana during the period of maize sowing. However, we also demonstrate that the risk to pollinators and other non‐target organisms may be rapidly and dramatically reduced without yield penalties, by aligning use rates of neonicotinoid insecticides with pest incidence. We demonstrate movement of neonicotinoid residues well beyond planted fields occurs during maize sowing in Indiana. Based on locations of maize fields and apiaries in the state, the likelihood of neonicotinoid exposure for foraging honey bees is high. Other non‐target organisms are also likely to encounter neonicotinoid residues; we conservatively estimate that deposition of neonicotinoid residues on non‐target lands and waterways will occur on over 42% of the state of Indiana during the period of maize sowing. However, we also demonstrate that the risk to pollinators and other non‐target organisms may be rapidly and dramatically reduced without yield penalties, by aligning use rates of neonicotinoid insecticides with pest incidence. Editor's Choice

Uptake and dissipation of neonicotinoid residues in nectar and foliage of systemically treated woody landscape plants

Neonicotinoid residues in honey from urban and rural environments

Influence of Pesticide Application Method, Timing, and Rate on Contamination of Nectar with Systemic and Nonsystemic Pesticides

Acetamiprid Fate in a Sandy Loam with Contrasting Soil Organic Matter Contents: A Comparison of the Degradation, Sorption and Leaching of Commercial Neonicotinoid Formulations.

Pesticide mixtures detected in crop and non-target wild plant pollen and nectar

Characterization of Near-Field Temporal and Spatial Variations of Pesticide Residues Using Honeybee Specimens As Bio-Sensing Matrices

Short-term persistence of foliar insecticides and fungicides in pumpkin plants and their pollinators

Planting of neonicotinoid‐treated maize poses risks for honey bees and other non‐target organisms over a wide area without consistent crop yield benefit

Plant versus pollinator protection: balancing pest management against floral contamination for insecticide use in Midwestern US cucurbits

Pollinator exposure to systemic insecticides and fungicides applied in the previous fall and pre-bloom period in apple orchards

Insights into the degradation and toxicity difference mechanism of neonicotinoid pesticides in honeybees by mass spectrometry imaging

The Implications of Using Pollen and Nectar Foraged by Honeybees As the Biomarkers for Total Neonicotinoid Exposures

Following Regulation, Imidacloprid Persists and Flupyradifurone Increases in Nontarget Wildlife

Behaviour of neonicotinoids in contrasting soils

Milkweed in agricultural field margins - A neonicotinoid exposure route for pollinators at multiple life stages

Distributions of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: a Temporal and Spatial Variation Analysis for Pollen and Honey Samples

Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment

Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees

Spatial and Temporal Distribution, Degradation, and Metabolism of Three Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Different Parts, Especially Pests' Target Feeding Parts of Apple Tree

Honey bees and bumble bees may be exposed to pesticides differently when foraging on agricultural areas

A novel pesticide has lethal consequences for an important pollinator