Abstract:Abstract Performance-related-pay (PRP) is a controversial topic. Views about its impact are mixed. Through a meta-analysis of studies in public administration, we aim to provide an evidence-based answer to the question: Does PRP work? Our meta-analysis finds a statistically significant, positive but small population effect size between PRP and employee and performance outcomes. Subgroup analyses show that PRPs impact is contingent upon the type of outcome, geographical context, government level, and data source rather than universal in nature. Effect sizes decrease when performance outcomes are measured as opposed to employee outcomes; in USA and European contexts compared to Asian contexts; at the local level compared to the federal level; and when multiple source or experimental data are used compared to single source data. Based on our findings and PRP literature, we construct a flowchart to support practitioners in deciding whether PRP may “work” for them while avoiding its many and typical pitfalls. Evidence for practice Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the impact of performance-related-pay (PRP) on employee and performance outcomes in public administration is statistically significant and positive; however, the fact that the effects sizes are small leads us to conclude that PRP is not a “magic bullet”. Intriguingly, performance outcomes are less impacted by PRP than employee-related outcomes like work motivation and job satisfaction, implying that PRP might carry some motivational benefits while its benefits for better performance outcomes are questionable. PRP seemingly works better in Asia than in Europe or the USA – arguably due to existing predispositions regarding the effects of rewards and monetary incentives – and also seems more effective at the federal than the local government level. Much of the small positive impact uncovered in this meta-analysis seems to be the result of the type of data used in studies. Specifically, studies using multiple or experimental data show a trivial and statistically insignificant overall impact. Practitioners thus need to carefully assess how they will evaluate PRPs impact to avoid biases due to data type. An evidence-based flowchart including questions at the macro (cultural and societal considerations), meso (specific organizational characteristics), and micro (individual and team behavior) level is presented as a support tool for practitioners in deciding upon and designing PRP systems in their organization.

Examining the Role of Employee Participation, Supervisor Trust, and Appraisal Reactions for a Pay-for-Performance Appraisal System

Key Factors in the Practice of Performance Management

The Effects of Perception of Pay-For-Performance and Self Efficacy on Pay Satisfaction

Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation: A Technique That Works

Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance

A Cognitive Evaluation and Equity-Based Perspective of Pay for Performance on Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model

Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems

Performance Appraisal Systems, Productivity, and Motivation: A Case Study

Assessing the ethics of implementing performance appraisal systems

Consequences of the performance appraisal experience

WHEN DOES PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MOTIVATE EMPLOYEE HELPING BEHAVIOR? THE CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE SUBJECTIVITY

Does Performance-Related-Pay Work? Recommendations for Practice Based on a Meta-Analysis

Performance Appraisal System and its Implication on Employee Performance: A Study of Zambia Revenue Authority

The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future

The Impact of Pay-for-performance Perception and Pay Level Satisfaction on Employee Work Attitudes and Extra-Role Behaviors

Performance Appraisal Systems: Determinants and Change

“Good” and “Bad” Control in Public Administration: The Impact of Performance Evaluation Systems on Employees’ Trust in the Employer

Satisfaction with a performance appraisal system and appraisal discussion

The Impact of Participative Leadership on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Distinguishing Between the Mediating Effects of Affective and Cognitive Trust

Disentangling the Impact of Perceived Electronic Performance Monitoring on Employee Burnout in the Public Sector

Public Service Motivation and Performance: The Role of Organizational Identification