A study of explanatory power of Liberal Intergovernmentalism toward the Economic and Monetary Union
Jun INOUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9748/hcs.2020.444
2020-01-01
International Journal of Human Culture Studies
Abstract:This paper empirically describes a gradual development of European Union's (EU’s) Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), in order to examine the explanatory power of Liberal Intergovernmentalism (LI). LI provides us with a tool to understand EU's institutional choices, in other words, integration, by focusing on (1) national preference formation, (2) interstate bargaining, and (3) institutional choice. After the EU and its member states tackled the financial and fiscal crisis and launched a plan to complete a genuine EMU, some scholars of LI highlighted that the policy preference of Germany, as the creditor of the EU, influenced the outcome of negotiations / institutional choices. However, all the decisions taken by EU and its member states are not concluded by German's interests. For example, European Central Bank's decision of an Outright Monetary Transactions contributed to calm down the crisis, though Germany opposed to the decision. Also, LI must show why a certain institutional solution was accepted by other member states and such a solution was understood as "lowering transaction costs". But LI's theoretical scope is static and short-time: LI explains a current institutional choice by the current national preference formation and interstate bargain at that time. It would be difficult to exhibit that member states learned from previous events and came to understand that a newly launched solution would contribute to lower the transaction costs of themselves. Therefore, this paper casts doubts on LI's arguments and analysis on the institutional choice after crisis, and exhibits the historical development of European Economic and Monetary Union. The history of Economic and Monetary Union tells us that every institutional choice of European monetary / currency issue was not made of a single member state's preference. In the cases of the Werner Report (the itinial plan for the economic and monetary union), the Snake, the European Monetary System, and the launch of Euro, member states' preferences were accepted / adopted partially and institutional designs in these cases were partial solutions to the questions at that times: integration was partially achieved and therefore integration was developed gradually. And what should be noted is that international financial market, especially speculation, might be both triggers of the crisis and judges to the European solutions to the crisis. These empirical findings imply that we have to consider other factors, for example, international political and economic environment, other than national governments and EU institutions, in order to analyze and explain the gradual development, in other words, stop and go, of European integration.