Abstract:<h3 class="a-plus-plus">Abstract</h3> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Purpose</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">To evaluate the risk of injury to the inferior lateral geniculate artery with two different techniques for lateral meniscus repair.</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Methods</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">Eight cadaveric knees were used. Inside-out sutures and an all-inside suture device were placed at the most lateral edge of the popliteal hiatus, and 15 and 30 mm anterior to this point. The minimum distances between the sutures and the inferior lateral geniculate artery were measured through a limited lateral arthrotomy. Artery penetration or collapse due to the sutures was also evaluated.</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec3"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Results</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">The median distance between the sutures and the artery when inserted at the lateral edge of the popliteal hiatus was 1.5 mm (interquartile range: 1.3) for the inside-out technique and 1.5 mm (1.3) for the all-inside technique (differences not significant, n.s.). When the sutures were inserted 15 mm anterior to the popliteal hiatus the distances were 1.0 mm (1.1) and 1.3 mm (1.0) for the inside-out technique and the all-inside technique, respectively (n.s.). When the sutures were inserted 30 mm anterior to the popliteal hiatus the distances were 1.0 mm (1.0) and 1.5 mm (1.0) for the inside-out technique and the all-inside technique, respectively (n.s.). The artery was punctured with two of the inside-out sutures placed 15 mm from the popliteal hiatus, no puncturing occurred in the all-inside technique (n.s.). Tying of the inside-out sutures resulted in obliteration of the artery in four of eight sutures placed at 15 mm from the popliteal hiatus and three of eight sutures at 30 mm; no obliteration of the artery was found using the all-inside device (significant differences, <em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.002).</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec4"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Conclusions</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">Although both all-inside and inside-out lateral meniscal repair techniques place sutures very close to the lateral geniculate artery, the inside-out technique is riskier as extra-articular knot tying can cause artery obliteration when suturing the part of the meniscus immediately lateral to the popliteal hiatus. Therefore, all-inside meniscal repair technique shows less risk of injury to the major blood supply of the lateral meniscus.</p> </span>

Correction to: The all-inside meniscal repair technique has less risk of injury to the lateral geniculate artery than the inside-out repair technique when suturing the lateral meniscus

Corrigendum for “A Novel Kinase Subverts Aluminium Resistance by Boosting Ornithine Decarboxylase‐dependent Putrescine Biosynthesis”

Correction: Isometric versus isotonic exercise in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy—Effects on shoulder pain, functioning, muscle strength, and electromyographic activity: A protocol for randomized clinical trial

Correction to “Therapeutic Assessment of Combination Therapy with a Neprilysin Inhibitor and Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Antagonist on Angiotensin II – Induced Atherosclerosis, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, and Hypertensin”

Correction: The efficacy of pediatric elbow radiographic guidance in diagnosis of lateral humeral condyle fracture

Correction: In vitro study of accuracy of subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion using calipers based on the gravity line

The all-inside meniscal repair technique has less risk of injury to the lateral geniculate artery than the inside-out repair technique when suturing the lateral meniscus

Correction: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Outcome and Reoperation Focusing on Extended Versus Limited Initial Repair

Corrigendum to Biomechanical analysis of single-incision anatomic repair technique for distal biceps tendon rupture using tunneling device

Using Virtual Reality for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Preoperative Planning: Erratum

Incorrect Institutional Affiliations of Authors in the Article by Jiang Et Al (arthritis Rheumatol, May 2014)

Corrigendum: Molecular Mechanism and Approach in Progression of Meningioma

Correction to: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis-surgical technique and procedure safety using anatomical checkpoints

Error in Display of Author Name

Correction: Angioarchitectural alterations in the retina and choroid in frontotemporal dementia

Correction to: Double chimney stent technique in bilateral sequential coronary occlusion during corevalve valve-in-valve procedure

Correction to: A year in review in Minerva Anestesiologica 2019. Critical care

Correction To: Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction after Total Gastrectomy is Associated with Better Short-Term Absorption Capacity and Quality of Life in Early-Stage Gastric Cancer Patients

Corrigendum to "The Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Trial of Extended-Release Triamcinolone Injection After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy"

Erratum: Adverse Events After Surgical Treatment of Adult Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures. A Retrospective Analysis of 470 Patients

Errors in Byline