The role of complementarity and selection effects in P acquisition of intercropping systems

Xiao-Fei Li,Cheng-Bao Wang,Wei-Ping Zhang,Le-Hua Wang,Xiu-Li Tian,Si-Cun Yang,Wan-Li Jiang,Jasper van Ruijven,Long Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3487-3
IF: 4.993
2017-11-14
Plant and Soil
Abstract:Background and aimsEnhanced crop productivity by intercropping is commonly assumed to be driven by resource complementarity. However, relatively few studies have directly measured resource acquisition to assess potential mechanisms underlying enhanced performance of intercropping.MethodsA long-term field experiment with three P application rates (0, 40, 80 kg P ha−1 yr.−1) and four maize-based intercropping systems was used to assess P acquisition and P fertilizer recovery efficiency (PRE) for three consecutive years. To identify underlying mechanisms, the additive partitioning method was applied to determine complementarity (CE) and selection effects (SE) in P acquisition of intercropping.ResultsAverage P acquisition increased by 28.4% and 27.6% compared to their monocultures in faba bean/maize and chickpea/maize intercropping, respectively. However, P acquisition was generally not enhanced and even reduced in the last year in soybean/maize and oilseed rape/maize intercropping. Enhanced P acquisition was due to positive CE in faba bean/maize, and to positive CE and SE in chickpea/maize intercropping.ConclusionsIncreased resource acquisition via CE and/or SE depended on the particular crop combination in intercropping systems. Application of the additive partitioning method to intercropping may help to identify underlying mechanisms of overyielding and carefully select crop combinations to enable more efficient resource use.
plant sciences,soil science,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?