Share Structure and Entrepreneurship in UK Biotechnology Companies: An Empirical Study

Olivier Maynard,William Bains
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2008.11421520
2008-04-01
Journal of Corporate Law Studies
Abstract:Biotechnology start-up companies are dependent on investment to discover and develop their products, and often get that investment from venture capital groups (VCs). VCs almost always invest in liquidation preference shares, which provides them with upside enhancement and downside protection, and they impose detailed management controls on the company through shareholder veto provisions. This has been suggested as laying the company open to “investor opportunism”, actions which drive the company to actions or strategies which, while enhancing the investor's short-term shareholding value, damages the company as a whole and restricts its long-term prospects in the US. This paper reports on an analysis of the effect of the combination of complex share structures with multiple levels of liquidation preference (the norm in UK biotechnology companies) and of comprehensive investor control over the company's management. We find the same problems occurring in UK biotechnology companies as Fried and Ganor found in the US, with examples of companies being prevented from achieving exits, raising investment rounds and being driven to mergers which add no value to the enterprise. This both reduces the value of investee companies (an issue that VCs should address) and reduces the willingness of entrepreneurs and business angels to create new companies for VCs to invest in. This is made worse by the chronic underinvestment in UK high-tech start-ups. Examination of a number of potential solutions finds few of them are workable, but that requiring companies to disclose contracts that effectively transfer the power of directors to non-director shareholders could have some benefit.
law
What problem does this paper attempt to address?