Positive Psychological Capital: From Strengths to Power

Edna Rabenu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69209-8_6
2017-01-01
Abstract:In today’s workplace, the hierarchy of authority in organizations is loosening (Daft (2015b) Organization theory and design. Boston: Cengage learning). Therefore, managers should use smart power (combining resources of soft and hard power) in order to supervise their subordinates more effectively. This chapter first reviews definitions of power, while suggesting a refined one based on resources, and secondly reviews the changes in the workplace that potentially undermine the traditional forms of managers’ authority. Those changes necessitate adopting soft power built on resources that can attract employees to cooperate. Thirdly, the chapter presents a process model in which psychological capital is a key element of managers’ power inventory. Psychological capital is defined as “an individual’s positive psychological state of development that is characterized by (1) having confidence (efficacy) to take on and put the necessary effort to succeed at challenging tasks; (2) making a positive attribution (optimism) about succeeding now and in the future; (3) persevering toward goals and, when necessary, redirecting paths to goals (hope) in order to succeed; and (4) when beset by problems and adversity, sustaining and bouncing back and even beyond (resiliency) to attain success” (Luthans et al. (2015) Psychological capital and beyond. New York: Oxford, University Press). According to this model, psychological capital widens the repertoire of resources needed especially to establish and conserve expert and referent bases of power. While increasing their own power, managers empower their employees and indirectly improve the performance of the entire unit. This improved performance increases the power of the managers and so forth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?