Effects of brain lesion on moral behavior and relevant ethical dilemma
Shuai Yang,Yi Zhao,Hong Wang,Xiting Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2019-0807
2020-01-01
Abstract:When talking about the relationship between moral behavior and brain functional localization, the former involves various moral abilities, and the latter refers to the specific brain network structures related to psychological functions. Moral behavior refers to the behavior that is beneficial or harmful to others or society, including good behavior and bad behavior. The moral consequence caused by brain injury is mainly demonstrated by immoral behavior, which is of great theoretical and practical value. By summarizing studies on whole-brain coordinated activities of morality, the present study attempts to clarify the influence of specific brain damages on moral behavior. The results showed that for the cerebral cortex, injury to the frontal cortex (i.e., the command and control center of the brain), leads to self-functional damage and further servility or blind obedience. In particular, the frontal cortex injury during infancy may cause risks for moral development. Next, orbital frontal cortex (OFC) injury mainly causes impairment in risky decision-making, social emotion, and self-information correction. Corresponding moral consequences include ignoring social etiquette and norms, and difficulties in establishing and maintaining close relationships. Also, injury to the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) may result in the damage of learning adaptation, abstract event judgment, self-control, and other functions. Relevant moral consequences are moral utilitarian preference and "acquired social disease", which is expressed as impulse behavior. Furthermore, temporal cortex injury leads to potential decreased control of the cerebral cortex and disorder of activation of limbic structure that results in violent attacks and other problems. In the subcortical area, amygdala injury leads to some patients' serious violence; and injuries of hypothalamus, globus pallidus and septum lead to improper satisfaction of basic physiological needs, mainly manifested as sexual moral disorders. The effects of some other brain localization injuries are discussed in specific neural networks. With regard to the brain mechanism of morality, research on brain injury does not aim to explore the direct relationships between morality and the brain, but to investigate the role of intermediate elements such as the psychological process (e.g., social cognition) and mental ability (e.g., memory ability). It is easy to fall into the ethical dilemmas when the relationship between brain injury and moral consequences is simply analyzed and then applied. The first dilemma concerns whether patients with brain injury have enough free will or self-discipline, and if not, how to evaluate their immoral behavior. The second dilemma is, whether there exists universal moral and ethical principles, and if not, how to evaluate the value of intervention and treatment that are applied to improve the morality of patients with brain injury. The third dilemma is, whether the realization of certain moral changes owing to brain injury can reduce patients' stigmatization, and if not, what is the next step. Studies along with these research lines are called for in the future: The cognitive neural mechanism of moral behavior, the diversification of the sequelae of brain lesions, generalization of these research findings to the Chinese people, and so on.