Abstract:Abstract Over the past few decades, cities have repeatedly demonstrated high levels of ambition with regard to climate action. Global environmental governance has been marked by a proliferation of policy actions taken by local governments around the world to demonstrate their potential to advance climate change mitigation and adaptation. Leading ‘by example’ and demonstrating the extent of action that it is possible to deliver, cities have aspired to raise the ambition of national and international climate governance and put action into practice via a growing number of ‘climate change experiments’ delivered on the ground. Yet accounts of the potential of cities in global environmental governance have often stopped short of a systematic valuation of the nature and impact of the networked dimension of this action. This article addresses this by assessing the nature, and challenges faced by, urban climate governance in the post‐Paris era, focusing on the ‘experimentation’ undertaken in cities and the city networks shaping this type of governance. First, we unpack the concept of ‘urban climate change experimentation’, the ways in which it is networked, and the forces driving it. In the second and third parts of the article, we discuss two main pitfalls of networked urban experimentation in its current form, focusing on issues of scaling experiments and the nature of experimentation. We call for increased attention to ‘scaling up’ experiments beyond urban levels of governance, and to transformative experimentation with governance and politics by and in cities. Finally, we consider how these pitfalls allow us to weigh the potential of urban climate ambition, and consider the pathways available for supporting urban climate change experimentation.While the analytical conflation of sub‐state and non‐state actors is understandable in the context of the traditional focus of global governance research on nation states, we would like to gently point out that to scholars working on urban governance, equating a city with a non‐state actor such as a multinational corporation is incomprehensible and analytically useless. To push forward the research agenda, future work on climate governance should make clear distinctions between local governments and other actors from the outset.

Heterotopia and the urban politics of climate change experimentation

The condition of urban climate experimentation

A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities

Resilient climate urbanism and the politics of experimentation for adaptation

Networking Cities after Paris: Weighing the Ambition of Urban Climate Change Experimentation

Urban Climate Governance Experimentation in Seoul: Science, Politics, or a Little of Both?

Socio-material governance tensions in nature-based solution experiments: lessons from Turin

Reparative Innovation for Urban Climate Adaptation

Global urban climate governance in three and a half parts: Experimentation, coordination, integration (and contestation)

Partnerships in Experimental Urban Climate Governance: Insights from Seoul

Understanding how city networks are leveraging climate action: experimentation through C40

Transitional Ecology: embedding ecological experiments into temporary urban public art

Situating C40 in the Evolution of Networked Urban Climate Governance

The Place and Time of the Political in Urban Political Ecology: Contested Imaginations of a River's Future

Cities, Climate Change and Urban Heat Island Mitigation: Localising Global Environmental Science

The limits to the urban within multi-scalar energy transitions: Agency, infrastructure and ownership in the UK and Germany

From lively spatial combinations to lively theorizations

Urban Experimentation and Institutional Arrangements

Science fiction, reconfigured social theory and the Anthropocene Age: exploring and thinking about planetary futures through fictional imaginaries

Understanding the science-policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective: Insights from the cases of Hamburg and São Paulo

CLIMATE‐JUST HOUSING: A Socio‐spatial Perspective on Climate Policy and Housing