Abstract:How does the language comprehension system identify and interpret word constituents-or morphemes-during sentence reading? We investigated this question by employing words containing semantically ambiguous roots (e.g., bark, with meanings related to both "dog" and "tree") which are disambiguated when affixed by -ing (e.g., barking; related to "dog" only). We aimed to understand whether higher-level access to the meaning of the root bark would be constrained by lower-level morphological affixation. In Experiment 1, using eye-tracking, participants read sentences containing words with semantically ambiguous roots, such as barking (a prime), combined with targets that were either related to two meanings of the root (dog, tree) or they were cloze and unrelated controls. All five eye-tracking measures we employed (first fixation duration, gaze duration, go-past time, total reading time, and regressions to target) showed no difference between the two root-related targets, which were slower than cloze, but faster than unrelated. Results show that even in cases where a meaning is inconsistent with the full word form (barking-tree), both meanings of the ambiguous root are activated. These results were supported by Experiment 2, employing a maze task in which the time to select the cloze (night) continuation for the sentence He heard loud barking during the … was disrupted by the presence of distractors related to both meanings of bark. We discuss the implications of these findings for the nature of morphological parsing and lexical ambiguity resolution in sentence contexts. We suggest that word recognition and lexical access processes involve separating roots from affixes, yielding independent and exhaustive access to root meanings-even when they are ruled out by affixation and context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?

Evaluating Contextualized Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis

The Effect of Semantic Similarity on Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language: An Event-Related Potential Study

Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings

The ambiguous nature of complex semantic types: an experimental investigation

Semantic access to ambiguous word roots cannot be stopped by affixation-Not even in sentence contexts: Evidence from eye-tracking and the maze task

Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context

The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish

Can LLMs assist with Ambiguity? A Quantitative Evaluation of various Large Language Models on Word Sense Disambiguation

Shades of meaning: Uncovering the geometry of ambiguous word representations through contextualised language models

The Inhibitory Mechanism in Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language

The Effect of Semantic Transparency in a Flanker Task

Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading

Processing of Translation-Ambiguous Words by Chinese–English Bilinguals in Sentence Context

Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT)

Grasping the invisible: Semantic processing of abstract words

The Resolution of English Lexical Ambiguity by Chinese EFL Learners in Sentential Context

Word Sense Disambiguation in Native Spanish: A Comprehensive Lexical Evaluation Resource

The Causal Structure of Semantic Ambiguities

Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation

A Survey on Lexical Ambiguity Detection and Word Sense Disambiguation