0968 Perceived Stress and Worry Mediate the Link Between Sleep Quality and Immune Function
Niloufar Lueke,Arash Assar,Vedant Desai,Kayla Diaz,Aena Jung,Izabella LeBlanc,Adam Lueke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0968
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Given that college students have an increased risk for spreading infection (White et al., 2003), it is important to examine factors that influence the immune functioning of this population. The present work examined the effect of sleep quality on the immune function of college students. Sleep problems are highly prevalent among college students (Kloss et al., 1011). Poor sleep quality has been shown to be related to reduced immune function (Irwin, 2015), and among college students, it has been linked to a multitude of negative outcomes, including heightened perceived stress (Veeramachaneni et al., 2019). Not only does poor sleep predict stress levels (Wu et al., 2015), but worry is a common cognitive reaction to stress (Borkovec et al., 1998). Worry has also been associated with reduced immune function (Brosschot et al., 2006). Based on this evidence, the present work proposed a serial mediation model, in which sleep quality (X) was modeled to increase perceived stress (M1), which in turn, increases worry (M2), thereby resulting in a decreased in immune function (Y). Methods Participants were 391 undergraduate students (68.3% female; Mage = 19.19, SDage = ±2.03) who completed scales related to sleep quality, perceived stress, worry, and immune function. Results A serial mediation model tested whether perceived stress (M1) and worry (M2) sequentially mediated the relation between poor sleep quality (X) and immune functioning (Y). A 95% bias-corrected confidence interval based on 5,000 bootstrap samples indicated that the indirect effect of perceived stress alone (i.e., X→M1→Y) was non-significant (indirect effect = .05, SE = .03, 95% CI [-.00, .11]). Likewise, the indirect effect through worry alone (i.e., X→M2→Y) was also non-significant (indirect effect = .01, SE = .01, 95% CI [-.01, .11]). Lastly, and as hypothesized, poor sleep quality was an indirect significant predictor of immune functioning through perceived stress and worry, in a sequential manner (i.e., X→M1→ M2→Y; indirect effect = .04, SE = .02, 95% CI [.01, .07]). Conclusion Findings demonstrate the importance of college students’ sleep in relation to both their mental health and subsequent immune functioning, rendering sleep as an important target for preventative intervention. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology