Abstract:High fidelity chromosome segregation during mitosis requires that cells identify the products of DNA replication during S-phase and then maintain that identity until anaphase onset. Sister chromatid identity is achieved through cohesin complexes (Smc1, Smc3, and Mcd1 and Irr1/Scc3), but the structure through which cohesins perform this task remains enigmatic. In the absence of unambiguous data, a popular model is that a subset of cohesin subunits form a huge ring-like structure that embraces both sister chromatids. This 'one-ring two-sister chromatid embrace' model makes clear predictions--including that premature cohesion loss in mitotic cells must occur through a substantial reduction in cohesin-DNA associations. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation to directly test for cohesin dissociation from well-established cohesin binding sites in mitotic cells inactivated for Pds5--a key cohesin regulatory protein. The results reveal little if any chromatin dissociation from cohesins, despite a regimen that produces both massive loss of sister chromatid tethering and cell inviability. We further excluded models that cohesion loss in mitotic cells inactivated for Pds5 arises through either cohesin subunit degradation, premature Hos1-dependent Smc3 de-acetylation or Rad61/WAPL-dependent regulation of cohesin dynamics. In combination, our findings support a model that cohesin complexes associate with each sister and that sister chromatid cohesion likely results from cohesin-cohesin interactions. We further assessed the role that Pds5 plays in cohesion establishment during S-phase. The results show that Pds5 inactivation can result in establishment defects despite normal cohesion loading and Smc3 acetylation, revealing a novel establishment role for Pds5 that is independent of these processes. The combination of findings provides important new insights that significantly impact current models of both cohesion establishment reactions and maintenance.

Scaffolding for Repair: Understanding Molecular Functions of the SMC5/6 Complex

Multiple Roles of SMC5/6 Complex during Plant Sexual Reproduction

The SMC5/6 complex: folding chromosomes back into shape when genomes take a break

Inducible Degradation of the Human SMC5/6 Complex Reveals an Essential Role Only during Interphase

Inducible Degradation of the Human SMC5/6 Complex Reveals an Essential Role Only during Interphase.

A Dirna-Protein Scaffold Module Mediates SMC5/6 Recruitment in Plant DNA Repair.

Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination

SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes

SMC5/6 Promotes Replication Fork Stability via Negative Regulation of the COP9 Signalosome

The <scp>SMC5</scp>/6 complex recruits the <scp>PAF1</scp> complex to facilitate <scp>DNA</scp> double‐strand break repair in <i>Arabidopsis</i>

The SMC5/6 Complex Subunit NSE4A Is Involved in DNA Damage Repair and Seed Development[OPEN]

A Swi/Snf Subunit Regulates Chromosomal Dissociation Of Structural Maintenance Complex 5 During Dna Repair In Plant Cells

Cryo-EM structures of Smc5/6 in multiple states reveal its assembly and functional mechanisms

Cohesin complex oligomerization maintains end-tethering at DNA double-strand breaks

The transcriptional coactivator ADA2b recruits a structural maintenance protein to double-strand breaks during DNA repair in plants.

The SMC5/6 complex recruits the PAF1 complex to facilitate DNA double-strand break repair in Arabidopsis.

Cohesin in DNA damage response and double-strand break repair

The Condensin Subunits SMC2 and SMC4 Interact for Correct Condensation and Segregation of Mitotic Maize Chromosomes.

Smc5/6 association with microtubules controls dynamic pericentromeric chromatin folding

Cohesin without Cohesion: A Novel Role for Pds5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Distinct Functions of Human Cohesin-SA1 and Cohesin-SA2 in Double-Strand Break Repair