Abstract:Perceptual and Motor Skills, Ahead of Print. Collaborative recall by groups of people can evoke both memory detriments (e.g., collaborative inhibition) and benefits (e.g., error pruning and post-collaborative memory benefit). Yet, it remains indeterminate whether these effects are due to the emotional valence of stimuli and/or the specific subtypes of episodic memory tested (i.e., item memory and source memory), and whether they are related to the research procedure of directed forgetting (DF). We introduced item-method DF into collaborative memory research using a turn-taking procedure. The to-be-recalled words were studied in different emotional valences and were followed by either an R or F cue, which, respectively, instructed participants to remember or forget the words presented. We conducted two recall sessions (Recall 1 and Recall 2) that included the two subtypes of episodic memory. Recall 1 was performed either individually or collaboratively, while Recall 2 was always performed individually. We observed three major findings: (a) a collaborative memory decrement - collaborative inhibition - was minimally affected in both item memory and source memory tasks by either the emotional valence of the stimuli or the DF cue; (b) a collaborative memory benefit - error pruning of item memory - persisted within both ongoing and post-collaboration, while error pruning of source memory only presented in ongoing collaboration, thus demonstrating the relevance of dual-process models that differentiate automatic familiarity and effortful recollection processes; and (c) there was no post-collaborative memory benefit, indicating the importance of the type of collaborative procedure. We discuss these results in terms of various theories, including the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSDH) which asserts that memory strategies tend to be disrupted in collaboration but are facilitated within post-collaboration. Also, we describe the implications of these results and directions for exploring other influential factors in future research.

Collaborative Memory Knowledge: A Distributed Reliabilist Perspective

Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory

Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?

Using Distributed Cognition Theory to Analyze Collaborative Computer Science Learning

Collaborative memory in a serial combination procedure

Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting

Memory as a cognitive requirement for reciprocal cooperation

Empirical factors affecting memory in collaborative versus nominal groups

Modeling collaborative memory with SAM

Collaborative Group Memory: Processes, Performance, and Techniques for Improvement

Disrupters As Well As Monitors: Roles of Others During and after Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure

Features of Successful and Unsuccessful Collaborative Memory Conversations in Long‐Married Couples

The Detrimental and Beneficial Effects of Collaboration Are Sensitive to Both Collaborative Frequency and Collaborative Order but Not to the Encoding Task

“Going episodic”: collaborative inhibition and facilitation when long-married couples remember together

Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions

Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research

Self-Improvising Memory: A Perspective on Memories as Agential, Dynamically Reinterpreting Cognitive Glue

Persistence of false memories and emergence of collective false memory: collaborative recall of DRM word lists

Collaborative memory for categorized lists: ongoing and lasting effects are sensitive to episodic memory tasks