Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing of Drinking Water Treatment Residuals in Freshwater Systems
Lang Zhou,Samuel M. Wallace,Kevin J. Kroll,Nancy D. Denslow,Jean‐François Gaillard,Peter Meyer,Jean‐Claude J. Bonzongo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5061
2021-05-25
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Abstract:<p>The beneficial use of DWTRs faces barriers due primarily to uncertainties and concerns about their potential environmental impacts. In this study, we used total and water leachable toxic metal concentrations, and two benthic organisms based bioassays to identify suitable DWTR‐substrates for introduction to freshwater systems. Using total metal contents and the consensus probable effect concentration concept, three DWTRs were selected and used in elutriate and toxicity studies. The concentrations of water leachable Ag, As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb, and Zn were below the USEPA's ambient water quality criteria. Using the long‐term 65‐day life cycle <i>Chironomus tentans</i> test and four different endpoints (survival, adult emergence, egg case production, and the number of eggs produced per female), no statistical differences were found between the DWTR‐treatments and the controls. Similarly, results obtained using the 10‐day <i>Hyallela azteca</i> test showed no toxicity. However, while both survival and growth were recorded in all bioassays, the results of the 10‐day <i>C. tentans</i> and the 28‐day <i>H. azteca</i> tests were ambiguous. For <i>C. tentans</i>, 2 of the 3 DWTRs resulted in significantly lower survival rates as compared to the controls. For <i>H. azteca</i>, no significant growth differences were observed between controls and DWTR‐treatments, but 2 of the 3 DWTRs resulted in significantly lower survival rates than the controls. Overall, these results suggest that certain DWTR‐substrates could be suitable for introduction to aquatic systems.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
environmental sciences,toxicology