Abstract:Among the organizational change literature,adaptation view and ecological view were two dominant perspectives.Adaptation view suggests that the purpose of organizational change is to adapt and achieve strategic fit with their environment.Yet researchers embracing ecological view have argued for an environmental selection process which determined the outcome of organization's behavior.This study recommends a brand new research paradigm,named the entrepreneurial view after a brief review of the two former perspectives.We developed a multi-level analytic framework to examine the effects of organization's proactive activities on its competitive advantage.It has long been noted that in a complex and intense competitive situation,the performance of an organization was dependent on its actions and rivals' reactions,so we were also concerned about how the organization's activities might affect the market process.The results indicated that proactive top managers of the firm would set expectations and search to identify the opportunities resulted from knowledge problem existing in the market.Those actions could establish a firm's competitive advantage to the extent that they exploit competitive ambiguity.Entrepreneurial alertness,professional knowledge,and creativity were three most important predictors of opportunity identification.Top managers adopted a bisociation process linking previously related or unrelated matrices of thought to seize the opportunities through entrepreneurial actions.Schumpeter and Kirzner had respectively defined entrepreneurial actions in two distinctive ways which we proposed as equilibrating and disequilibrating actions.Both actions were the consequence of bisociation process.Entrepreneurial actions carried out by the firm would eventually update the belief systems of all the market participants,yet leading to different market conditions according to the actions' appropriateness.It's in this way the firm had the capability to push the market process.Further in this study we used competitive dynamics theory to discuss how the firms evolved with their environment and to explore how two characteristics of the top management team might influence firm's competitive success.A series of interrelated and logically consistent propositions were presented to elaborate our analytic framework.Implications for the entrepreneurial view were discussed.

A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior

Organizational Change and Market Process:An Entrepreneurial Perspective

Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy

The Exploration on the Entrepreneurship Performance Structure and the Explanation Based on Contract

The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective

The Micro Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Causal Model Validation

An Intentions-Based Model of Entrepreneurs’ Prosocial Behavior

A Psychological Model of Entrepreneurial Decision Making

The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research

Opening the black box of employee entrepreneurship decision-making

Entrepreneurial Resources, Organizational Choices, and Competitive Outcomes

An Action-Level Specification and Implications of Strategic Entrepreneurship for Performance

Entrepreneurial Cognition of the Business Model Construct: A Mixed Methods Study of STEM and non-STEM Entrepreneurs

Organizational networks and the process of corporate entrepreneurship: how the motivation, opportunity, and ability to act affect firm knowledge, learning, and innovation

Entrepreneurship as a career choice: intentions, attitudes, and outcome expectations

A Comprehensive Model Of The Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition

Entrepreneurial motivation

Psychological and sociological determinants of entrepreneurial intentions and behaviors

Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior

Does Desperation Breed Deceiver? A Behavioral Model of New Venture Opportunism

Development of conceptual model for entrepreneurship education