Abstract:Introduction Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive disease comprising 1-5% of all plasma cell dyscrasias. Although historically pPCL has been defined by circulating plasma cells (CPCs) ≥ 20% and 2.0 × 109/L, many series require only one of these two criteria for diagnosis. Over time there has been a pressing need to change the definition further in order to capture patients at an earlier stage of the disease. Recent studies have shown that multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have CPCs ≥ 5% but < 20% at diagnosis have similarly poor outcomes. These thresholds for defining pPCL have not been studied in the current era of novel agents. While bortezomib-based regimens have been shown to extend pPCL patient survival, studies with next-generation agents such as carfilzomib (CFZ), pomalidomide, and daratumumab (DARA) are still scarce. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who at diagnosis had pPCL (defined as CPCs ≥ 20% or 2.0 × 109/L) or had MM with < 20% CPCs (MM-CPC). Patients were treated at our institution between 1/1/2000-7/17/2020. Overall response rates were determined according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the length of time between initiation of first line therapy and death. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the length of time between initiation of first line therapy and first progression. OS and PFS were compared using log-rank tests. Results Of the 54 patients identified, 38 had pPCL and 16 had MM-CPC. The median age at diagnosis of the pPCL and MM-CPC groups were 59.2 (range 43-94) and 59.8 years (range 29-79), respectively, with a similar percentage of females, 47.4% vs. 37.5%. Both groups were similarly distributed by year of diagnosis; 76.3% and 62.5% of pPCL and MM-CPC patients were diagnosed between 2012-2020, respectively. The pPCL cohort had median CPCs of 40% (15-98) while the MM-CPC cohort had median CPCs of 4% (1-15). Median CPCs at diagnosis was 3.36 (0.44-179) × 109/L in the pPCL group compared to 0.33 (0.04-1.79) × 109/L in the MM-CPC group. Most patients for both groups were ISS stage III at diagnosis (57.9% in pPCL cohort, 56.2% in MM-CPC cohort). R-ISS assessment was not feasible due to missing data. A greater proportion of patients in the pPCL group (44.7%) had complex cytogenetics at diagnosis compared to the MM-CPC group (25.0%). All patients were exposed to at least one novel agent over the entire disease course. Of these patients, 50 (92.6%) were exposed to bortezomib, 45 (83.3%) to lenalidomide, 33 (61.1%) to CFZ, 22 (40.7%) to DARA, 13 (24.1%) to pomalidomide, and 4 (7.4%) to venetoclax. Twenty-four patients (44.4%) received an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). At the best response to treatment, 76.7%, 62.8% and 37.9% of patients achieved a partial response or greater to first, second and third line therapy, respectively. The median OS of the pPCL and MM-CPC groups was 34.5 and 35.5 months (p = 0.97) (Figure 1A), while the median PFS was 13.9 and 10.9 months (p = 0.52) (Figure 1B), respectively. The median follow-up was 28.1 months. No differences were observed for patients with CPCs < 20% compared to patients with CPCs ≥ 20% (p = 0.98). There was trend towards a better survival for patients with CPCs < 2 × 109/L compared to CPCs ≥ 2 × 109/L (p = 0.35). Since we did not observe any meaningful difference in OS or PFS between the pPCL and MM-CPC groups, we combined these groups for further survival analysis. Patients exposed to either DARA or CFZ (n = 37) had a median OS of 59.2 months, while patients exposed to neither drug (n = 17) had a median OS of 11.7 months (p = 0.02) (Figure 1C). ASCT was associated with a prolonged median OS (66.8 months vs. 17.2 months, p = 0.0001) (Figure 1D), while a complex karyotype at diagnosis was associated with a poorer median OS (17.4 months vs. 66.8 months, p = 0.01). Conclusions In the era of next-generation novel agents, overall and progression-free survival of pPCL and MM-CPC patients are similar. Patients exposed to DARA or CFZ have an improved survival compared to those who did not receive these drugs. ASCT is also associated with a superior survival over those who did not receive a transplant. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these next-generation drugs in this patient population. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding. Wolf:Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Shah:GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding. Wong:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fortis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: Mayo-AGIMM study of 410 patients from two separate cohorts

Treatment approach and outcomes of patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms in the current era

Outcomes of intensive and nonintensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN

Comparison of outcomes of HCT in blast phase of BCR-ABL1 − MPN with de novo AML and with AML following MDS

Genetic factors rather than blast reduction determine outcomes of allogeneic HCT in BCR-ABL–negative MPN in blast phase

Management and outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era – analysis of the European LeukemiaNet Blast Phase Registry

Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of a Pan-Canadian Cohort of Adolescents and Young Adults with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Canadian MPN Group Study

Predictors of clinical outcome in myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group study

Long-Term Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Mutational landscape of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-BP) and antecedent MPN

Clinical Impact of the New Bone Marrow Blasts Cutoff Defined By the International Classification Consortium (ICC) in Myeloid Neoplasms with Mutated TP53 gene

Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms

A comparative analysis of the clinical and genetic profiles of blast phase BCR::ABL1‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasm and acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia‐related

Real-world study of children and young adults with myeloproliferative neoplasms: identifying risks and unmet needs

Long Term Survival Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Induction Therapy+ Autologous STEM CELL Trasplantation, Comparing Velcade-Dexametasone to Alkylating Polichemotherapy As Induction Therapy

Clinical Presentation and Long‐Term Survival Outcomes of Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Real world predictors of response and 24-month survival in high-grade TP53 -mutated myeloid neoplasms

Characterization of myeloproliferative neoplasms based on genetics only and prognostication of transformation to blast phase

Novel Gene Mutations Associated with Disease-Free Survival in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving First-Line Induction-Consolidation with or without Azacitidine Post-Remission Treatment

Outcomes of Plasma Cell Leukemia Patients in the Era of Next-Generation Novel Agents: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Long-term survival of NPM1 AML treated with intensive chemotherapy with extensive molecular data available