Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement

Experimenting with Public Engagement Platforms in Local Government

Online Resolution and Citizen Empowerment

The social media innovation challenge in the public sector

No one-size-fits-all: Multi-actor perspectives on public participation and digital participatory platforms

Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

Exploring emergent collaborations for digital transformation in local governments: The engagement of public libraries in the development of smart cities

Engagement in the digital age: Understanding "what works" for participatory technologies in environmental decision-making

Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy?

Reverse Technology Assessment in the Age of the Platform Economy

Rethinking public participation in the smart city

Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions

Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

Digital Civics: Citizen Empowerment With and Through Technology

Government Digital Transformation: Understanding the Role of Government Social Media

Digital Democracy: Episode IV -- A New Hope, How a Corporation for Public Software Could Transform Digital Engagement for Government and Civil Society

Citizen participation and digital transformation: new horizons for government-public interaction

E-Government and its Development in the Region: Challenges

Implementing open government: a qualitative comparative analysis of digital platforms in France, Italy and United Kingdom