Abstract:In his paper “Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders” (April 2018), Lex M. Bouter [[1]Bouter L. Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 96: 143-146Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar] highlights and appeals for orchestrated efforts to foster responsible research. We applaud Bouter's scholarship on promoting transparency and openness in biomedical research, and we share the same concern on the current replicability crisis. The science development is inevitably imbued with errors, fabrications, and falsifications, which makes reproducibility essential by separating true science from mere anecdote and even pseudoscience. When scientists try to replicate previous studies, two scenarios will emerge: consistent if not exactly the same findings as the formers, or different or conflicting results. Regardless either due to misconducts or flawed research, irreproducibility, without proper explanations, often casts shadows on responsible research. This applies to both natural and social sciences. We echo Bouter's appeal that improving reproducibility requires persistent and adaptive efforts of all stakeholders in research ecosystem. And we believe this is particularly important for emerging science powers where academic misconducts are looming over their escalating R&D investment and scientific achievements (Hu et al. 2018) [[2]Hu G. Yang Y. Tang L. Retraction and research integrity education in China.Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; (Letter)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0017-xCrossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar]. Fortunately, tremendous efforts facilitating research integrity and reproducibility have been put forth by major funding agencies, universities, and third parties globally. Take China for example. Over the last decade, the Chinese government has penned substantially stricter regulations combating research misconduct. A cornucopia of guidelines promulgated by a variety of government organizations has conveyed a clear signal of China's tighter stance fostering responsible research. Yet, prescription alone is not sufficient to deter prospective fraudsters and irresponsible researchers. All countries including China need to move beyond releasing guidelines and penalizing egregious cases. Orchestrated including institutionalizing research ethics and integrity training through education is critical in fostering responsible research in the long run. Download .xml (.0 MB) Help with xml files Data Profile Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholdersJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 96PreviewIn their recent commentary, Wallach et al. explain that breaches of research integrity will typically do damage to the reliability and validity of biomedical research [1]. This may harm regulatory and clinical decision-making. Consequently health care and public health may suffer. They point out that prevalent questionable research practices like poor study design, low power and selective reporting probably do substantially more damage than the rare occurrence of the classical “deadly sins” of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Full-Text PDF Unsuccessful replication is not a sign of research misconductJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 104PreviewI applaud Tang et al. for pointing out that in China—as is the case in Asia at large—interesting initiatives to foster research integrity are being taken [1]. In fact this is one of the main reasons that the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity will be held in Hong Kong ( www.wcri2019.org ). I'm also grateful for the opportunity to clarify some common misunderstandings about replicability and replication. Full-Text PDF

Scientific integrity resource guide: Efforts by federal agencies, foundations, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, and academia in the United States

Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Research Integrity definitions and challenges

Navigating the Science System: Research Integrity and Academic Survival Strategies

Improving Systems to Promote Research Integrity

Safeguarding Scientific Integrity: Examining Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review Process

Rooting out scientific misconduct

Guidelines and Initiatives for Good Research Practice

The Multiple Challenges of Handling Scientific Integrity in the Swiss Higher Education System

Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities

Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review

Protecting and promoting editorial independence

Reproducibility, Replicability, and Transparency in Research: What 430 Professors Think in Universities across the USA and India

Science as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science

Research on the Dilemma and Development Path of Scientific Research Integrity Management from the Perspective of Data Management

Orchestrated Efforts to Foster Responsible Research

Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?

Assessing the reliability and credibility of industry science and scientists

Causes and countermeasures of research-integrity problems in the new era: From the perspective of the culture of science

Scientists and scientific journals should adhere to ethical standards for the use and reporting of data from Indigenous people

Finding the truth in science