EXAMINING RURAL-URBAN POPULATION CHANGE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES *
Colmore S. Christian,B. Gyawali,Duncan M. Chembezi,S. Banerjee,M. Silitonga,J. Bukenya,A. Hill
2013-05-01
Abstract:ABSTRACTThis study examined the factors that influenced population change in 875 counties in the southeastern United States between 1970 and 2000, using U.S. Census data. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between socioeconomic factors and population change. The results of marginal probability estimates indicate that race and employment factors have been strongly related to population change in these counties. African-American-dominant counties have lost population to urban areas of more diverse counties. Our results suggest that individuals place high importance on better education, job opportunities, and living conditions in their decisions to move from their traditional places to new places. Additionally, rural counties need to develop resilience by improving community capital and quality of life amenities to sustain rural population and attract more retirees in rural corridors.(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)Urban sprawl and rural rebound have both been observed and analyzed in many parts of the United States. Urban sprawl, also known as suburban sprawl, is the spreading outward of a city and its suburbs over rural land and its outskirts (Burchell 1998). It is characterized as low density, noncontiguous, automobile- dependent, residential, and nonresidential development that covers and consumes large amounts of farmland and natural areas. Urban sprawl has been recognized as an urban expansion augmented by the out-migration of young rural population, which leads to undesirable impacts in terms of sacrifice of farmland and loss of amenity benefits from open spaces on the urban fringe (Osman, Nawawi, and Abdullah 2008). Rural rebound is defined as the movement of people from urban areas to suburban regions (Johnson and Lichter 2007). Rural rebound has been observed in recent decades. Many researchers have considered it as a positive factor in reducing urban sprawl. However, such in-migration to rural counties has occurred more among retirees or older people who are not as active as an economically-productive population (Johnson 2006). An increase of members of a specific age group (especially of an older population) in rural counties may not contribute positively to rural development unless there are incentives to attract younger populations as well. Race has also become a factor for rural rebound, showing residential concentration of a specific race in certain locality.Achieving a balance between rural rebound and urban sprawl is a subject of research for regional scientists and geographers and for those seeking balanced regional growth. Such balance is required because urban sprawl has challenged the stewardship of the agricultural labor force, farm lands, and food sufficiency in the rural areas over time. Similarly, an increasing trend of urban population growth has created demands for more services (e.g., drinking water, electricity, and infrastructure), and increased property values and taxes, as well as increased urban crime rates and pollution. Increased residential concentration of minority populations has posed another challenge in the urban centers, creating imbalances in property values, school districts, crime rates, and quality of life.Past research has analyzed rural out-migration and its impacts on urban sprawl, residential segregation, quality of life, amenity factors, and sustainability (Albrecht 2010; Albrecht and Albrecht 2000; England and Brown 2003; Goe, Noonan, and Thurston 2003; Gyawali et al. 2010; Hancock 2001). Tobin (1999) suggested that demographic structure and out-migration to urban areas need to be carefully addressed if we are to attain any level of sustainability in urban communities as higher population growth trends in urban places may lead to increased disaster losses. A healthy community is one that has high levels of social, ecological, human, and economic capital, collectively called community capital (England and Brown 2003; Hancock 1999). …
Sociology,Geography