Abstract:We investigated the potential of wildflower strips to modify plant‐pollinator networks. By comparing networks from wildflower strips and other agricultural field margin habitats, we found that increasing flower species richness significantly reduced network connectance, a measure of network complexity, and marginally reduced bee species' niche overlap, a proxy for insect competition. These findings are of general relevance in ecology and epidemiology, as we provide a new framework for the development of conservation measures where ecological interactions and network structure are taken into consideration beyond the current target of increasing species richness and abundance. Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established.

Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales

Pollinator diversity benefits natural and agricultural ecosystems, environmental health, and human welfare

Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification

Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops

Agriculturally dominated landscapes reduce bee phylogenetic diversity and pollination services

Dominant species stabilize pollination services through response diversity, but not cross‐scale redundancy

A meta-analysis of single visit pollination effectiveness

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Text‐analysis reveals taxonomic and geographic disparities in animal pollination literature

Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Sustainable nature‐based solutions require establishment and maintenance of keystone plant‐pollinator interactions

Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity

Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards

Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

Dynamic energy budget model for a bumble bee colony: Predicting the spatial distribution and dynamics of colonies across multiple seasons

Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor

Impact of landscape configuration and composition on pollinator communities across different European biogeographic regions

Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

Thermal biology diversity of bee pollinators: taxonomic, phylogenetic and plant community-level correlates

The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats

A spatially extended model to assess the role of landscape structure on the pollination service of Apis mellifera