Abstract:The colloidal borescope, using colloidal particle motion, is used to monitor the flow velocities and directions of groundwater. It integrates advanced techniques such as microscopy, high-speed photography, and big data computing and enjoys high sensitivity at the micron level. However, In the same well, the groundwater flow velocity monitored by colloidal hole mirror is varies greatly from that obtained by conventional hydrogeological monitoring, such as pumping test. In order to solve this problem, the stability catcher and stratified packer are designed to control the interference of the vertical flow in drilling, and to monitor the flow velocity and direction of groundwater velocity at the target aquifer and target fracture. Five wells with different aquifers and different groundwater types were selected for monitoring in south-central China. The instantaneous velocity and direction are converted into east–west component and north–south component, the average velocity and direction is calculated according to the time of 10 min, and the particle trajectory diagram is established. Based on these results, it proposed a concept of cumulative flow velocity. Using curve-fitting equations, the limits of cumulative flow velocities as the monitoring time tends to infinity were then calculated as the actual flow velocities of the groundwater. The permeability coefficient of aquifer is calculated by using the fissure ratio of aquifer, hydraulic slope and flow velocity, and compared with the permeability coefficient obtained by pumping test. The results are as follows: (1) The variation coefficient of the instantaneous flow velocity measured at the same depth in the same well at different times is greater than that of the time average flow velocity and greater than that of the cumulative flow velocity. The variation coefficient of the actual velocity is the smallest, indicating that the risk of using the actual flow velocity is lower. (2) The variation coefficient of the flow rate monitored at different depths in the same well is mainly controlled by the properties of the aquifer. The more uniform water storage space in the aquifer, the smaller the variation coefficient. (3) The comparison between the permeability coefficient obtained by monitoring and the permeability coefficient obtained by pumping test shows that the flow of structural fissure water controlled by planar fissure is more surface flow, and the results are consistent. When the groundwater flow is controlled by pores and solution gaps, the flow channel is complicated, which is easy to produce turbulent flow, and the result consistency is poor. (4) According to different research accuracy requirements, different monitoring and calculation methods can be selected for different aquifers and groundwater types. Researches show that, the permeability coefficient calculated for the actual flow velocity in well DR01 is the same as that calculated for the pumping test. The aquifer characteristics reflected by the coefficient of variation of the actual flow velocity in the same aquifer are more realistic. The pumping test method obtains the comprehensive parameters of a certain aquifer, and this method can be used to monitor a certain fissure. In this paper, the new technology developed for monitoring, and the new algorithm established for data processing, can accurately obtain the flow velocity and direction of groundwater, using capsule hole mirror monitoring method. The key parameters of hydrogeology can be obtained by using one well, which can reduce the time and cost input and improve the work efficiency.

Hybrid Multilevel System for Monitoring Groundwater Flow and Agricultural Impacts in Fractured Sedimentary Bedrock

Aquifer Characterization Using Fiber Bragg Grating Multi‐Level Monitoring System

A New Waterflood Initialization Protocol With Wettability Alteration for Pore-Scale Multiphase Flow Experiments

Two-dimensional Inversion of CSAMT Data and Three-Dimensional Geological Mapping for Groundwater Exploration in Tongkeng Area, Hunan Province, China

Development of a vadose zone advanced monitoring system: Tools to assess groundwater vulnerability

Remote Sensing and Assessment of Compound Groundwater Flooding Using an End-to-End Wireless Environmental Sensor Network and Data Model at a Coastal Cultural Heritage Site in Portsmouth, NH

Multidisciplinary monitoring of an in-situ remediation test of chlorinated solvents

Comprehensive, Multi‐Scale Evaluation of Field Methods for Assessing Stream–Aquifer Interactions Along Channelised Lowland Streams

Monitoring strategies at phreatic wellfields: a 3D travel time approach

A Groundwater Monitoring Design Through Site Characterization, Numerical Simulation and Statistical Analysis – A North American Case Study

Characterization of the subsurface architecture and identification of potential groundwater paths in a clay-rich floodplain using multi-electrode resistivity imaging

Water Level in Observation Wells Simulated from Fracture and Matrix Water Heads Outputted by Dual‐Continuum Hydrogeological Models: POWeR‐FADS

Assessment of Managed Aquifer Recharge Sites Using a New Geophysical Imaging Method

Estimating the impact of vadose zone heterogeneity on agricultural managed aquifer recharge: A combined experimental and modeling study

A Novel Method for In-Situ Monitoring and Quantifying the Dynamic Responses of Groundwater to the Effects of Mining

3D hydrogeophysical characterization of managed aquifer recharge basins

Data Mining Virtual Contaminated Sites to Develop an Educational Learning Tool supported by a k-NN Machine Learning Predictive Algorithm for use in Environmental Engineering Education

Wireless MEMS-Based In-Place Inclinometer-Accelerometer Array for Real-Time Geotechnical Instrumentation

An improved technology for monitoring groundwater flow velocity and direction in fractured rock system based on colloidal particles motion

Multi-source machine learning and spaceborne remote sensing data accurately predict three-dimensional soil moisture in an in-service uranium disposal cell

Integrating ERT and SP Techniques for Characterizing Aquifers and Surface‐Groundwater Interactions