Effect of Negative Online Reviews and Physician Responses on Health Consumers' Choice: Experimental Study
Xi Han,Yongxi Lin,Wenting Han,Ke Liao,Kefu Mei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/46713
IF: 7.076
2024-03-12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of online medical services. Although some researchers have investigated how numerical ratings affect consumer choice, limited studies have focused on the effect of negative reviews that most concern physicians. Objective: This study aimed to investigate how negative review features, including proportion (low/high), claim type (evaluative/factual), and physician response (absence/presence), influence consumers' physician evaluation process under conditions in which a physician's overall rating is high. Methods: Using a 2×2×2 between-subject decision-controlled experiment, this study examined participants' judgment on physicians with different textual reviews. Collected data were analyzed using the t test and partial least squares–structural equation modeling. Results: Negative reviews decreased consumers' physician selection intention. The negative review proportion (β=–0.371, P <.001) and claim type (β=–0.343, P <.001) had a greater effect on consumers' physician selection intention compared to the physician response (β=0.194, P <.001). A high negative review proportion, factual negative reviews, and the absence of a physician response significantly reduced consumers' physician selection intention compared to their counterparts. Consumers' locus attributions on the negative reviews affected their evaluation process. Physician attribution mediated the effects of review proportion (β=–0.150, P <.001), review claim type (β=–0.068, P =.01), and physician response (β=0.167, P <.001) on consumer choice. Reviewer attribution also mediated the effects of review proportion (β=–0.071, P <.001), review claim type (β=–0.025, P =.01), and physician response (β=0.096, P <.001) on consumer choice. The moderating effects of the physician response on the relationship between review proportion and physician attribution (β=–0.185, P <.001), review proportion and reviewer attribution (β=–0.110, P <.001), claim type and physician attribution (β=–0.123, P =.003), and claim type and reviewer attribution (β=–0.074, P =.04) were all significant. Conclusions: Negative review features and the physician response significantly influence consumer choice through the causal attribution to physicians and reviewers. Physician attribution has a greater effect on consumers' physician selection intention than reviewer attribution does. The presence of a physician response decreases the influence of negative reviews through direct and moderating effects. We propose some practical implications for physicians, health care providers, and online medical service platforms.
health care sciences & services,medical informatics