Abstract:The relationship of scientific knowledge development to technological development is widely recognized as one of the most important and complex aspects of technological evolution. This paper adds to our understanding of the relationship through use of a more rigorous structure for differentiating among technologies based upon technological domains (defined as consisting of the artifacts over time that fulfill a specific generic function using a specific body of technical knowledge). The key findings of the work are: Firstly, a Pearson correlation of 0.564 is found between technological relatedness among technological domains based upon patents citing other patents and technological relatedness among technological domains based upon patents citing similar scientific papers. This result indicates that a large portion of technological relatedness is due to relatedness of the underlying scientific categories. Secondly, the overall structure of the links found between scientific categories and technological domains is many-to-many rather than focused indicating a science-fostered mechanism for fairly broad “spillover”: Specific technological domains cite a wide variety of scientific categories; some scientific categories are cited in a variety of domains. Thirdly, some evidence is found supporting the co-evolution of science and technology but the evidence is not strong. Prior research that identifies emerging patent clusters and independent prior research identifying emerging scientific topics show statistically significant but qualitatively weak inter-relationships between the clusters and topics. This work also offers evidence that patent cluster emergence can, but does not usually, precede the emergence of related scientific topics. The lack of clear evidence for co-evolution is interpreted as resulting from the documented complex many-to-many relationship of science categories and technological domains and is not considered evidence against co-evolution.

The mutually beneficial relationship of patents and scientific literature: topic evolution in nanoscience

Visualizing Scientific Frontiers and Emerging Trends in the Domain of Nano-functional Materials

Research trend of nanoscience and nanotechnology – A bibliometric analysis of Nano Today

Knowledge Convergence of Science and Technology in Patent Inventions

Technological evolutionary trajectories based on patent citation network-By taking data mining domain as example

Patent data-driven analysis of literature associations with changing innovation trends

Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology

Nanotechnology As a Field of Science: Its Delineation in Terms of Journals and Patents

Relying on recent and temporally dispersed science predicts breakthrough inventions

The Delineation of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Terms of Journals and Patents: a Most Recent Update

Comparing nanotechnology landscapes in the US and China: a patent analysis perspective

Identifying Technology Evolution Pathways Using Topic Variation Detection Based on Patent Data: A Case Study of 3D Printing

Advanced Technology Evolution Pathways of Nanogenerators: A Novel Framework Based on Multi-Source Data and Knowledge Graph

An analysis of the evolution of science-technology linkage in biomedicine

Eco-system Mapping of Techno-Science Linkages at the Level of Scholarly Journals and Fields.

Temporal search in the scientific space predicts breakthrough inventions

Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

China–US Scientific Collaboration in Nanotechnology: Patterns and Dynamics

The Nexus of Open Science and Innovation: Insights from Patent Citations

PatentMiner: topic-driven patent analysis and mining.

Delineating development trends of nanotechnology in the semiconductor industry: Focusing on the relationship between science and technology by employing structural topic model