Abstract:The dairy industry is facing criticism for its role in exacerbating global GHG emissions, as climate change becomes an increasingly pressing issue. These emissions mostly originate from methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and carbon dioxide (CO2). An optimal strategy involves the creation of an economical monitoring device to evaluate methane emissions from dairy animals. Livestock production systems encounter difficulties because of escalating food demand and environmental concerns. Enhancing animal productivity via nutrition, feeding management, reproduction, or genetics can result in a decrease in CH4 emissions per unit of meat or milk. This CH4 unit approach allows for a more accurate comparison of emissions across different animal production systems, considering variations in productivity. Expressing methane emissions per unit allows for easier comparison between different sources of emissions. Expressing emissions per unit (e.g., per cow) highlights the relative impact of these sources on the environment. By quantifying emissions on a per unit basis, it becomes easier to identify high-emission sources and target mitigation efforts accordingly. Many environmental policies and regulations focus on reducing emissions per unit of activity or output. By focusing on emissions per unit, policymakers and producers can work together to implement practices that lower emissions without sacrificing productivity. Expressing methane emissions in this way aligns with policy goals aimed at curbing overall greenhouse gas emissions. While it is true that total emissions affect the atmosphere globally, breaking down emissions per unit helps to understand the specific contributions of different activities and sectors to overall greenhouse gas emissions. Tackling cattle health issues can increase productivity, reduce GHG emissions, and improve animal welfare. Addressing livestock health issues can also provide favourable impacts on human health by reducing the prevalence of infectious illnesses in livestock, thereby mitigating the likelihood of zoonotic infections transmitting to humans. The progress in animal health offers the potential for a future in which the likelihood of animal diseases is reduced because of improved immunity, more effective preventative techniques, earlier identification, and innovative treatments. The primary objective of veterinary medicine is to eradicate clinical infectious diseases in small groups of animals. However, as the animal population grows, the emphasis shifts towards proactive treatment to tackle subclinical diseases and enhance production. Proactive treatment encompasses the consistent monitoring and implementation of preventive measures, such as vaccination and adherence to appropriate nutrition. Through the implementation of these measures, the livestock industry may enhance both animal well-being and mitigate the release of methane and nitrous oxide, thereby fostering environmental sustainability. In addition, advocating for sustainable farming methods and providing farmers with education on the significance of mitigating GHG emissions can bolster the industry's endeavours to tackle climate change and infectious illnesses. This will result in a more robust and environmentally sustainable agriculture industry. This review seeks to conduct a thorough examination of the correlation between the health condition of cattle, the composition of milk produced, and the emissions of methane gas. It aims to identify areas where research is lacking and to provide guidance for future scientific investigations, policy making, and industry practices. The goal is to address the difficulties associated with methane emissions in the cattle industry. The primary global health challenge is to identify the causative relationship between climate change and infectious illnesses. Reducing CH4 and N2O emissions from digestive fermentation and animal manure can be achieved by improving animal well-being and limiting disease and mortality.

Improvement of economic traits and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in sheep and goats in Central Asia

The Key Role of Production Efficiency Changes in Livestock Methane Emission Mitigation

Climate change: Production performance, health issues, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies in sheep and goat farming

The greenhouse gas emissions from meat sheep production contribute double of household consumption in a Eurasian meadow steppe

Global Strategies to Minimize Environmental Impacts of Ruminant Production.

Synergy between ecological and economic benefits of grassland animal husbandry: Maduo County, Qinghai Province as an example

Balancing farm profit and greenhouse gas emissions along the dairy production chain through breeding indices

Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study

Alternative Approaches to Feeding Small Ruminants and Their Potential Benefits

Variability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Relation to Economic and Ecological Indicators from Cattle Farms

Instability of decoupling livestock greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth in livestock products in the Tibetan highland

Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from three livestock production systems in Ethiopia

Co-reduction of nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in global livestock production

Improve animal health to reduce livestock emissions: quantifying an open goal

Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 2. Incorporating methane emissions into the breeding goal

Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector

Sustainable Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Small Ruminants Farming

A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in the Andalusian Autochthonous Dairy Goat Production Systems

Livestock greenhouse gas emission and mitigation potential in China

Relationship between Dairy Cow Health and Intensity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

An assessment of GHG emissions from small ruminants in comparison with GHG emissions from large ruminants and monogastric livestock