Troponina cTnT-hs: una questione di genere e di età? Valutazione di limiti decisionali differenziati per genere ed età in una popolazione afferente al Dipartimento di Emergenza

Maria Aurora Burgio,Giulio Marino,Dina Di Maria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13631-018-0184-z
2018-03-01
Abstract:Background.The determination of high sensitivity Troponin (cTnI-hs and cTnT-hs) now represents the essential step in the clinical practice of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), for diagnosis, early rule-out, risk stratification, and evaluation of outcomes. It is used also in patients without ACS cardiac damage. Taking into consideration the stratification of the populations, differentiated cut-offs according to gender and age are recently proposed for a more precise diagnosis and supported by a growing literature and above all by the large multicenter study related to Troponin T (the TRAPID Study).Methods.In the Clinical Pathology of the Hospital “Barone Lombardo” in Canicattì, we implemented differentiated cut-offs by gender and age in the Emergency Department (ED) population of the year 2016 with a history suggestive of ACS, by analyzing the two age and sex variables both individually and simultaneously. The Troponin measured was high sensitivity troponin T (cTnT-hs Roche Elecsys®) on Cobas 6000 Roche (ECLIA) with a suggested cut-off of 14 pg/ml.Results.3970 patients were analyzed: 2111 males (M) and 1859 females (F); 105 cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were identified with the single cut-off of 14 pg/ml. By inserting differentiated cut-offs (15.5 pg/ml for M; 9 pg/ml for F) we obtained an improvement in the rule-in and rule-out (+4.2% rule-in for F; +4.5% rule-out for M). Moreover, the population was better stratified using cut-offs by age (9.12 pg/ml for <65 years; 24.47 pg/ml >65 years): the rule-in population over 65 years decreased from 42% to 22%. Combined gender and age differentiated cut-offs (<65 years the 2 different cut-offs for M and F and a single cut-off of 28 pg/ml ≥65 years) showed the best performance for the in rule-in/rule-out.Conclusions.For appropriate and personalized reports, in our population under examination and with the analytical method in use, differentiated cut-offs for age and for gender have positive effect on the rule-in/rule-out process in the ACS population. Gender-specific analysis, which often stresses the underestimation of AMI in women, demonstrates that a preventive and training approach towards cardiovascular risk prevention, especially for young women, is necessary in the general population. Nevertheless, the simultaneous use of both criteria shows the best performance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?