Abstract:Phenomenon: Professionalism is integral to the role of the physician. Most professionalism assessments in medical training are delayed until clinical rotations where multisource feedback is available. This leaves a gap in student assessment portfolios and potentially delays professional development. Approach: A total of 246 second-year medical students (2013-2015) completed self- and peer assessments of professional behaviors in 2 courses following a series of Team-Based Learning exercises. Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the alignment or misalignment in the relationship between the 2 types of assessments. Four subgroups were formed based on observed patterns of initial self- and peer assessment alignment or misalignment, and subgroup membership stability over time was assessed. A missing data analysis examined differences between average peer assessment scores as a function of selective nonparticipation. Findings: Spearman correlation demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between self-assessments completed alone (no simultaneous peer assessment) and self-assessments completed at the time of peer assessments ( = .59, p < .0001) but weak correlation between the two self-assessments and peer assessments (alone: = .13, p < .013; at time of peer: = .21, p < .0001). Generalized estimating equation models revealed that self-assessments done alone (p < .0001) were a significant predictor of self-assessments done at the time of peer. Course was also a significant predictor (p = .01) of self-assessment scores done at the time of peer. Peer assessment score was not a significant predictor. Bhapkar's test revealed subgroup membership based on the relationship between self- and peer ratings was relatively stable across Time 1 and Time 2 assessments ((2) = 0.83, p = .84) for all but one subgroup; members of the subgroup with initially high self-assessment and low peer assessment were significantly more likely to move to a new classification at the second measurement. A missing data analysis revealed that students who completed all self-assessments had significantly higher average peer assessment ratings compared to students who completed one or no self-assessments with a difference of -0.32, 95% confidence interval [-0.48, -0.15]. Insights: Multiple measurements of simultaneous self- and peer assessment identified a subgroup of students who consistently rated themselves higher on professionalism attributes relative to the low ratings given by their peers. This subgroup of preclinical students, along with those who elected to not complete self-assessments, may be at risk for professionalism concerns. Use of this multisource feedback tool to measure perceptual stability of professionalism behaviors is a new approach that may assist with early identification of at-risk students during preclinical years.

Metacognition gains in public health graduate students following in-class peer evaluation

Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment

Examination of the Quality and Effectiveness of Peer Feedback and Self‐reflection Exercises Among Medical Students

Integrating Peer Review in an Online Advanced Physical Examination Course

An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials

The power of peers: Using peer‐assisted learning to develop critical appraisal skills for evidence‐based practice

Enhancing Students’ Skills in Applying Theory Through Collaborative and Active Learning: A Pre-Post Evaluation of an Innovative Theory Course for Graduate Public Health Students

Assessment of Learner Metacognition in a Professional Pharmacy Elective Course

A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Prompting undergraduate students’ metacognition of learning: implementing ‘meta-learning’ assessment tasks in the biomedical sciences

Peer and self-evaluation using active teaching method

Metacognition in oral health education: A pedagogy worthy of further exploration

Action learning and public health pedagogy: Student reflections from an experiential public health course

Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy

The influence of near-peer teaching on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs: A systematic integrative review

Student Peer Review and Receptiveness to Feedback in Global Classrooms

Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs

Investigating the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Students

Implementation of problem-based learning modules in an introduction to public health course

Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment