Abstract:Rationale Research on diagnostic reasoning has been conducted for fifty years or more. There is growing consensus that there are two distinct processes involved in human diagnostic reasoning: System 1, a rapid retrieval of possible diagnostic hypotheses, largely automatic and based to a large part on experiential knowledge, and System 2, a slower, analytical, conscious application of formal knowledge to arrive at a diagnostic conclusion. However, within this broad framework, controversy and disagreement abound. In particular, many authors have suggested that the root cause of diagnostic errors is cognitive biases originating in System 1 and propose that educating learners about the types of cognitive biases and their impact on diagnosis would have a major influence on error reduction. Aims and Objectives In the present paper, we take issue with these claims. Method We reviewed the literature to examine the extent to which this theoretical model is supported by the evidence. Results We show that evidence derived from fundamental research in human cognition and studies in clinical medicine challenges the basic assumptions of this theory—that errors arise in System 1 processing as a consequence of cognitive biases, and are corrected by slow, deliberative analytical processing. We claim that, to the contrary, errors derive from both System 1 and System 2 reasoning, that they arise from lack of access to the appropriate knowledge, not from errors of processing, and that the two processes are not essential to the process of diagnostic reasoning. Conclusions The two processing modes are better understood as a consequence of the nature of the knowledge retrieved, not as independent processes.

Diagnosing Diagnostic Models: From Von Neumann’s Elephant to Model Equivalencies and Network Psychometrics

Diagnostic Classification Models: Recent Developments, Practical Issues, and Prospects

Diagnostic models and the nature of psychiatric disorder.

A One‐Parameter Diagnostic Classification Model with Familiar Measurement Properties

Abductive and Consistency-Based Diagnosis Revisited: a Modeling Perspective

Development of Cognitive Diagnosis Models and Their Application Methods

Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors

New development of cognitive diagnosis models

A Dual‐Purpose Model for Binary Data: Estimating Ability and Misconceptions

Applications of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Literature Review and Critical Commentary

Model Comparison in Cognitive Modeling

A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions

Reflecting on diagnosis: The Metacognitive Diagnostic Reasoning Model©

In Search of Optimal Cognitive Diagnostic Model(s) for ESL Grammar Test Data

A Diagnostic Framework for the Bradley–Terry Model

Learning From What You Don't Observe

A More General Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles

Modification Indices for Diagnostic Classification Models

Development & Prospect of Model-based Diagnosis

Diagnosis Model Based on Extension of Knowledge Space Theory

Dual process models of clinical reasoning: The central role of knowledge in diagnostic expertise