Abstract:e16164 Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is established as a safe and effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent advancements in molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have led to exploration of combining DEB-TACE with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immunotherapy. However, real-world evaluations of DEB-TACE in combination with TKIs or immunotherapy are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE alone, DEB-TACE with TKIs, and DEB-TACE with TKIs and immunotherapy. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 124 patients with unresectable HCC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2018 to April 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: DEB-TACE alone (DTACE, 45 patients), DEB-TACE plus TKI (DTACE+TKI, 51 patients), and DEB-TACE plus TKI and immunotherapy (DTACE+TKI+IM, 28 patients). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare efficacy and safety between DTACE and DTACE+TKI. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), assessed by RECIST Version 1.1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Among the patients, 99 were male and 25 were female, with 88.7% in BCLC-B or C stage. Before enrollment, 50.8% had received other treatments. In the DTACE+TKI+IM group, mPFS and mOS were higher compared to DTACE or DTACE+TKI alone (mPFS: 15.2 vs 9.2 for DTACE, 8.7 for DTACE+TKI; mOS: 32.3 vs 25.0 for DTACE, 20.9 for DTACE+TKI), though not statistically significant. ORR and DCR were 31.3% and 86.7% in DTACE, 35.3% and 84.3% in DTACE+TKI, and 39.3% and 96.4% in DTACE+TKI+IM, respectively. PSM analysis for DTACE and DTACE+TKI showed slightly better mPFS and mOS in DTACE+TKI (mPFS: 9.5 vs 9.2 months; mOS: 26.2 vs 19.4 months). No treatment-related deaths occurred, and serious adverse events (AEs) were comparable among the groups, with pain being the most common. AE. Notably, the frequency and severity of pain were closely related to the type of drug-eluting beads used, with the incidence of severe pain significantly lower in the HepaSphere DEB-TACE group compared to the CalliSphere or DCB group (0% versus 12.4% versus 19.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: DEB-TACE has been demonstrated as a safe, feasible, and efficacious treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC. There is a notable trend towards prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when DEB-TACE is combined with TKIs and immunotherapy. Moreover, HepaSphere DEB-TACE shows a lower incidence of severe pain compared to other types of drug-eluting beads, further highlighting its potential advantages in managing HCC.

CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study

[Clinical Investigation on Transarterial Chemoembolization with Indigenous Drug-Eluting Beads in Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

The Comprehensive Analysis Of Efficacy And Safety Of Callispheres (R) Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization In 367 Liver Cancer Patients: A Multiple-Center, Cohort Study

Efficacy And Safety Of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization By Callispheres (R) In 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From The Chinese Callispheres (R) Transarterial Chemoembolization In Liver Cancer (Ctilc) Study

Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study

Safety And Efficacy Of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization With Callispheres (R) Microsphere For Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Preliminary Study

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres (R) drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with secondary liver cancer: a preliminary result from CTILC study

Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres® Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Evaluation of Transarterial Chemoembolization Protocol with Drug-Eluting Beads in Combination with Lipiodol for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Controlled Study

Comparison of Liver Function and Safety in Hepatocellular Cancer Patients Treated with DEB-TACE and Ctace: a Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres is Effective and Well Tolerated in Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study

Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-eluting CalliSpheres ® bead transarterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, prospective study

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Bead with Conventional Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents or Immunotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellullar Carcinoma: Real-world Evaluation.

Assessment of efficacy and safety by CalliSpheres versus HepaSpheres for drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Transcatheter Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Epirubicin-Loaded DC Beads in Chinese Patients

Efficacy of CalliSpheres® drug-loaded microspheres combined with doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres® Beads in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Comparative Study of the Short-Term Efficacy and Safety between DEB-TACE and C-TACE in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma, a Retrospective Study

Comparison of DEB-TACE and cTACE for the initial treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria: A single-center propensity score matching analysis