Post-campaign coverage evaluation of a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity in five districts in India, 2019–2020
Jeromie Wesley Vivian Thangaraj,Christine Prosperi,Muthusamy Santhosh Kumar,Alvira Z. Hasan,V. Saravana Kumar,Amy K. Winter,Avi Kumar Bansal,Sanjay L. Chauhan,Gagandeep Singh Grover,Arun Kumar Jain,Ragini N. Kulkarni,Santanu Kumar Sharma,Biju Soman,Itta K. Chaaithanya,Sanchit Kharwal,Sunil K. Mishra,Neha R. Salvi,Nilanju P. Sarmah,Sandeep Sharma,Adarsh Varghese,R. Sabarinathan,Augustine Duraiswamy,D. Sudha Rani,K. Kanagasabai,Abhishek Lachyan,Poonam Gawali,Mitali Kapoor,Saurabh Kumar Chonker,Lucky Sangal,Sanjay M. Mehendale,Gajanan N. Sapkal,Nivedita Gupta,Kyla Hayford,William J. Moss,Manoj V. Murherkar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297385
IF: 3.7
2024-03-29
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Background In alignment with the Measles and Rubella (MR) Strategic Elimination plan, India conducted a mass measles and rubella vaccination campaign across the country between 2017 and 2020 to provide a dose of MR containing vaccine to all children aged 9 months to 15 years. We estimated campaign vaccination coverage in five districts in India and assessed campaign awareness and factors associated with vaccination during the campaign to better understand reasons for not receiving the dose. Methods and findings Community-based cross-sectional serosurveys were conducted in five districts of India among children aged 9 months to 15 years after the vaccination campaign. Campaign coverage was estimated based on home-based immunization record or caregiver recall. Campaign coverage was stratified by child- and household-level risk factors and descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for not receiving the campaign dose. Three thousand three hundred and fifty-seven children aged 9 months to 15 years at the time of the campaign were enrolled. Campaign coverage among children aged 9 months to 5 years documented or by recall ranged from 74.2% in Kanpur Nagar District to 90.4% in Dibrugarh District, Assam. Similar coverage was observed for older children. Caregiver awareness of the campaign varied from 88.3% in Hoshiarpur District, Punjab to 97.6% in Dibrugarh District, Assam, although 8% of children whose caregivers were aware of the campaign were not vaccinated during the campaign. Failure to receive the campaign dose was associated with urban settings, low maternal education, and lack of school attendance although the associations varied by district. Conclusion Awareness of the MR vaccination campaign was high; however, campaign coverage varied by district and did not reach the elimination target of 95% coverage in any of the districts studied. Areas with lower coverage among younger children must be prioritized by strengthening the routine immunization programme and implementing strategies to identify and reach under-vaccinated children.
multidisciplinary sciences