Abstract:Securing adequate capital is an ongoing challenge for small and medium-sized family businesses (SMFBS). However, most theoretical and empirical studies of capital structure focus on public corporations. Propositions relating to profits maximization and assumptions of perfect information and rational economic behavior have limited the validity of these theories, casting some doubt on their ability to explain capital structure decisions in SMFBS. An alternative approach propose that, in raising finance, managers follow a pecking order in which internal funds are preferred, followed by debt, hybrid securities, and then, as a last resort, a new issue of ordinary share. The new pecking order theory does not rely on the existence of a target debt-equity ratio and seems to explain the actual financing behavior of SMFBS because they are believed to be more adverse to risk and loss of control.According to the new pecking order theory, considerable studies have been conducted on the financing behavior of SMFBS. First, experimental studies show that SMFBS obtain most of their capital by internal finance. Moreover, plenty of household resources flow into businesses because of the intermingling of family and business finance in SMFBS. The household-to-business intermingling creates less constructive behaviors and leads to decisions that are good in short run but not for long-run sustainability. Although family sources may play a critical role during the very early stages of the business, external sources became increasingly important as the business grew and matured. Second, debt financing is the major sources of external funds for SMFBS. SMFB’s owner-managers are believed to act to reduce risk exposure by maintaining lower debt levels, but this opinion is not always supported by empirical evidence. Some studies provide evidence that, thanks to personal and well-informed relationships with banks and other parties, SMFBS enjoy greater availability and lower cost of credit than non-family business. On the contrary, some studies indicate that there are virtually no differences between them in the usage of various credit products. Therefore, researchers have to resort to other approaches such as the financial growth circle theory to explain this controversy. Third, compared with non-family businesses, the equity route of SMFBS is proved to follow the linear process of dilution as supposed by the classical financial theory because of risk factors and beliefs that advantages of stock exchange listing outweigh its advantages. When compared with their non-family counterparts, SMFBS are less likely to use venture capital for the fear of dilution of control and loss of management freedom. Also, some SMFBS in certain countries have gone public and competed successfully with non-family business on the new market. Ownership concentration is positively evaluated by investors on this market, thus family interest and business interest are balanced in a long-term strategy which is simultaneously in favor of family control and entry of external investment.Plenty of researches have identified that SMFB owner’s personal characteristic and preference are of significant influence in capital structure decisions. Therefore, future research should attempt to develop empirically-based models that show relationships between those factors and SMFB owner-manager’s financing decisions. In addition, it would be helpful to employ dynamic analysis to explain the dynamic change of SMFB’S financing behavior. Last but not least, future research might seek to find out what competitive advantages or disadvantages the ″special financial logic″ of SMFB financing lead to and thus provide support for decision-making of owner-managers and policy-makers.

Effects of size of business, business lines, and ownership concentration on operating performance of an enterprise

A Survey of Studies on Small and Medium-sized Family Business Financing

How Ownership Structure Affects Bank Deposits and Loan Efficiencies: an Empirical Analysis of Chinese Commercial Banks

The Effects of Bank Privatization on Performance and Prudential Behavior in China: Does State Ownership Matter?

The Market Structure,Performance and Economy of Scale of Chinese Banking Industry——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data from 2004 to 2007

The Effects of Foreign Strategic Investors on Business Models in China'S Commercial Banks: Does Ownership Structure Matter?

THE EFFECTS OF MULTIMARKET CONTACT ON MARKET ENTRY AND PERFORMANCE——Research on Shareholding Commercial Banks in China

Ownership Structure,Bank Lending and Financial Performance:Evidence Based on the City Commercial Bank in China

Foreign entry and bank competition on financial products in China: A model of bank size

The Effects of Ownership on Banks' Performance in China

The affecting factors of small and medium enterprise performance

Chinese Commercial Bank's Market Power and Its Affects on the Efficiency and Stability

Working Capital Management And Firm Performance In China

The Effect of Competition and Bank Size on Bank Stability in ASEAN-5 Countries

The effects of business models on bank risk before, during and after financial crisis: evidence from China

An exploration of operational efficiency, market efficiency, and sustainable development in the banking industry

World Financial Crisis and Efficiency of Chinese Commercial Banks

Banking Structure and Industrial Growth: Evidence from China

Bank Performance in China: A Perspective from Bank Efficiency, Risk-Taking and Market Competition

Asset Allocation and Bank Resilience: China Insights

Aligning the Interests of Multiple Principals: Ownership Concentration and Profitability in China's Publicly-Traded Firms