Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the association between the effectiveness of risk committee (RC) and firms’ performance in Malaysian context. It also explores whether political connection has an impact on the relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study, using a principle components analysis, derives a factor score for RC attributes to proxy the effectiveness of RC. It also uses both accounting and market performance to measure the company performance. Findings Using a sample of financial firms from 2004 to 2018, this study finds that both accounting and market performance are higher for firms with an effective RC. It also finds that the effectiveness of RC in monitoring and management of risks is more pronounced for politically connected firms (PCFs). In further tests, the paper finds that RC attributes (i.e. RC independence, qualification and gender) are positively and significantly associated with accounting performance, while those of RC existence and overlap are positively and significantly related to market performance. The study also finds that RC size (RC diligence) has a positive (negative) impact on financial firms accounting and market performance. The further analysis also shows that PCFs with a separate as well as larger RCs experience both higher accounting and market performance. This study’s results are robust for concerns of endogeneity. Practical implications The findings of this study resolve the ongoing debates surrounding political connection by suggesting financial firms not to have politically connected board members as doing so may deteriorate their performance. This study’s results are also useful for investors, regulators and policymakers. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study, for the first time, introduces on the interaction term between the effectiveness of RCs and political connection to empirically explore how an effective RC may reduce the potential risk of political ties. As such, this study adds to the literature and sheds light on an aspect of risk (i.e. risk stems from establishing close link with the government) that is growing in importance.

Political connections and stock price crash risk: evidence of institutional investors’ heterogeneous monitoring

No. 008/2020/FIN Political Connection as an Investor Endorsement Device

The Stock Market Implication of Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Dividend Policy

Internal Control and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Institutional investor stability and crash risk: Monitoring versus short-termism?

Executive Political Connections, Information Disclosure Incentives, and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Chinese Non-State-Owned Enterprises

Common Institutional Ownership and Stock Price Crash Risk

Managerial Political Orientation and Stock Price Crash Risk

Foreign Investors, External Monitoring, and Stock Price Crash Risk

Corporate relationship spending and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign

Board social capital and stock price crash risk

Institutional cross-ownership and stock price crash risk

Social capital, independent director connectedness, and stock price crash risk

Capital Market Consequence of Institutional Investment Constraint: Evidence from the Stock Price Crash Risk in China

Power Distance, Political Uncertainty, and Stock Price Crash Risk: International Evidence

The impact of political connection and risk committee on corporate financial performance: evidence from financial firms in Malaysia

Corporate social responsibility and stock-price crash risk: test of regulation mechanism based on institutional ownership and internal control

Examining the Governance Effect of Institutional Investors on Stock Price Crash Risk

Heterogeneous Institutional Investors, Short Selling and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Minority shareholders' activism and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Does media coverage deter firms from withholding bad news? Evidence from stock price crash risk