Abstract:Understanding learning and memory mechanisms is an important goal in neuroscience. To gain insights into the underlying cellular mechanisms for memory formation, synaptic plasticity processes are studied with various techniques in different brain regions. A valid model to scrutinize different ways to enhance or decrease synaptic transmission is recording of long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD). At the single cell level, spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) protocols have emerged as a powerful tool to investigate synaptic plasticity with stimulation paradigms that also likely occur during memory formation in vivo. Such kind of plasticity can be induced by different STDP paradigms with multiple repeat numbers and stimulation patterns. They subsequently recruit or activate different molecular pathways and neuromodulators for induction and expression of STDP. Dopamine (DA) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been recently shown to be important modulators for hippocampal STDP at Schaffer collateral (SC)-CA1 synapses and are activated exclusively by distinguishable STDP paradigms. Distinct types of parallel synaptic plasticity in a given neuron depend on specific subcellular molecular prerequisites. Since the basal and apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons are known to be heterogeneous, and distance-dependent dendritic gradients for specific receptors and ion channels are described, the dendrites might provide domain specific locations for multiple types of synaptic plasticity in the same neuron. In addition to the distinct signaling and expression mechanisms of various types of LTP and LTD, activation of these different types of plasticity might depend on background brain activity states. In this article, we will discuss some ideas why multiple forms of synaptic plasticity can simultaneously and independently coexist and can contribute so effectively to increasing the efficacy of memory storage and processing capacity of the brain. We hypothesize that resolving the subcellular location of t-LTP and t-LTD mechanisms that are regulated by distinct neuromodulator systems will be essential to reach a more cohesive understanding of synaptic plasticity in memory formation.

Interregional synaptic maps among engram cells underlie memory formation

Synaptic architecture of a memory engram in the mouse hippocampus

Brain-wide mapping reveals that engrams for a single memory are distributed across multiple brain regions

Memory Storage in Distributed Engram Cell Ensembles

Synaptic Engram

Parallel emergence of stable and dynamic memory engrams in the hippocampus

CA1 Engram Cell Dynamics Before and After Learning

Synaptic plasticity-dependent competition rule influences memory formation

Functionally Distinct Neuronal Ensembles Within the Memory Engram

Synaptic Conditions for Auto-Associative Memory Storage and Pattern Completion in Jensen Et Al.’s Model of Hippocampal Area CA3

Ultrastructural Synaptic Correlates of Spatial Learning in Rat Hippocampus

Deconstruction of a memory engram reveals distinct ensembles recruited at learning

Emerging many-to-one weighted mapping in hippocampus-amygdala network underlies memory formation

Synaptic Clustering and Memory Formation

Neuroligin-3-Mediated Synapse Formation Strengthens Interactions between Hippocampus and Barrel Cortex in Associative Memory

Mechanisms of memory-supporting neuronal dynamics in hippocampal area CA3

Coexistence of Multiple Types of Synaptic Plasticity in Individual Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons

Brain-wide measurement of synaptic protein turnover reveals localized plasticity during learning

Spatially resolved transcriptomic signatures of hippocampal subregions and Arc-expressing ensembles in active place avoidance memory

A Synaptic Framework for the Persistence of Memory Engrams

Intrinsic neural excitability biases allocation and overlap of memory engrams